Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26200583›Full record

ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2015

Teaching Quality Improvement in Graduate Medical Education: An Experiential and Team-Based Approach to the Acquisition of Quality Improvement Competencies.

Karen Hall Barber, Karen Schultz, Abigail Scott, Emily Pollock, Jyoti Kotecha, Danyal Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How to Successfully Run Trainee QI Projects.Journal of graduate medical education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Article
  12. A Project-Based, Resident-Led Quality Improvement Curriculum Within a Pediatric Continuity Clinic.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Teaching Root Cause Analysis Using Simulation: Curriculum and Outcomes.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karen Hall BarberK. Hall Barber is associate professor, Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, and physician lead, Queen's Family Health Team, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.K. Schultz is associate professor and program director, Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, and family physician, Queen's Family Health Team, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.A. Scott is data and quality improvement analyst, Queen's Family Health Team, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.E. Pollock is research associate, Centre for Studies in Primary Care, Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.J. Kotecha is assistant director, Centre for Studies in Primary Care, and adjunct assistant professor, Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.D. Martin is manager, Quality Improvement Plans & Quality Improvement Strategies, Health Quality Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Karen Schultz
Abigail Scott
Emily Pollock
Jyoti Kotecha
Danyal Martin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemAn emerging priority in medical education is the need to facilitate learners' acquisition of quality improvement (QI) competencies. Accreditation bodies in both Canada and the United States have included QI and patient safety in their core competencies. APPROACH: In 2010, the Department of Family Medicine at Queen's University designed a graduate medical education curriculum to engage residents in a clinical QI program that would meet accreditation requirements. Monthly didactic sessions were combined with an experiential, team-based QI project that aligned with existing clinic priorities. The curriculum spans the first year of residency and is divided into three stages: (1) Engaging, (2) Understanding, and (3) Improving and translating. In Stage 1, teams of residents select a clinical QI topic, engage stakeholders, and collect baseline data related to their topic. In Stage 2, they focus on understanding their problem, interpreting their results, and applying QI tools. In Stage 3, they develop change ideas, translate their knowledge, and prepare to hand over their project. OUTCOMES: This QI curriculum aided residents in effectively acquiring QI competencies and allowed them to experience real-world challenges, such as securing project buy-in, negotiating with peers, and developing solutions to problems. Unlike in many QI programs, residents learned how to improve quality rather than about QI; thus, they formed the necessary foundation to carry out QI work in the future. NEXT STEPS: The curriculum will be evaluated using a knowledge assessment and satisfaction tool and postproject resident interviews. Facilitators will focus more on improving faculty develop ment in QI.

Indexed as

CurriculumQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareAccreditationCanadaClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateFamily PracticeHumansInternship and ResidencyPatient SafetyProgram Development

Identifiers

PMID26200583
PMCPMC4585484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.