Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26200524›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB

A new improved protocol for in vitro intratubular dentinal bacterial contamination for antimicrobial endodontic tests: standardization and validation by confocal laser scanning microscopy.

Flaviana Bombarda de Andrade, Marcela Paola Castro Arias, Amanda Garcia Alves Maliza, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte, Márcia Sirlene Zardin Graeff, Pablo Andrés Amoroso-Silva, Raquel Zanin Midena, Ivaldo Gomes de Moraes

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of EDTA Formulations and Activation Methods on Stem Cell Response, Antimicrobial Activity and Dentine Integrity: An In Vitro Study.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A new model ofHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Iranian endodontic journal · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Flaviana Bombarda de AndradeDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry,, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Marcela Paola Castro AriasDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry,, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Amanda Garcia Alves MalizaDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry,, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Marco Antonio Hungaro DuarteDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry,, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Márcia Sirlene Zardin GraeffIntegrated Research Center, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Pablo Andrés Amoroso-SilvaDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry,, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Raquel Zanin MidenaDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry,, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Ivaldo Gomes de MoraesDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry,, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare three methods of intratubular contamination that simulate endodontic infections using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). MATERIAL AND

methodsTwo pre-existing models of dentinal contamination were used to induce intratubular infection (groups A and B). These methods were modified in an attempt to improve the model (group C). Among the modifications it may be included: specimen contamination for five days, ultrasonic bath with BHI broth after specimen sterilization, use of E. faecalisduring the exponential growth phase, greater concentration of inoculum, and two cycles of centrifugation on alternate days with changes of culture media. All specimens were longitudinally sectioned and stained with of LIVE/DEAD for 20 min. Specimens were assessed using CLSM, which provided images of the depth of viable bacterial proliferation inside the dentinal tubules. Additionally, three examiners used scores to classify the CLSM images according to the following parameters: homogeneity, density, and depth of the bacterial contamination inside the dentinal tubules. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests were used to evaluate the live and dead cells rates, and the scores obtained.

resultsThe contamination scores revealed higher contamination levels in group C when compared with groups A and B (p<0.05). No differences were observed between group A and B (p>0.05). The volume of live cells in group C was higher than in groups A and B (p<0.05).

conclusionThe new protocol for intratubular infection resulted in high and uniform patterns of bacterial contamination and higher cell viability in all specimens when compared with the current methods.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalEnterococcus faecalisAnimalsCattleCentrifugationCulture MediaDental Pulp CavityDentinGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsMicrobial ViabilityMicroscopy, ConfocalReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID26200524
PMCPMC4716703
OpenAlexW1792611857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.