Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26200484›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)

PIRADS 2.0: what is new?

Baris Turkbey, Peter L Choyke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Comparison of micro-ultrasound and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: A multicenter, prospective analysis.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  10. Intraindividual comparison betweenEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. PI-RADS v2: Current standing and future outlook.Turkish journal of urology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Baris TurkbeyMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland, USA. turkbeyi@mail.nih.gov.
Peter L Choyke

Funding

Prostate Cancer ImagingZIABC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$49.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

European UnionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleObserver VariationPractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26200484
PMCPMC4557320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.