Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26200461›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Trends in Stranding and By-Catch Rates of Gray and Harbor Seals along the Northeastern Coast of the United States: Evidence of Divergence in the Abundance of Two Sympatric Phocid Species?

David W Johnston, Jaime Frungillo, Ainsley Smith, Katie Moore, Brian Sharp, Janelle Schuh, Andrew J Read

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

David W JohnstonDivision of Marine Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University of Marine Laboratory, 135 Duke Marine Lab Rd., Beaufort, NC, 28516, United States of America.
Jaime FrungilloDivision of Marine Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University of Marine Laboratory, 135 Duke Marine Lab Rd., Beaufort, NC, 28516, United States of America.
Ainsley SmithDivision of Marine Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University of Marine Laboratory, 135 Duke Marine Lab Rd., Beaufort, NC, 28516, United States of America; Integrated Statistics, 16 Sumner Street, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, United States of America.
Katie MooreInternational Fund for Animal Welfare, Marine Mammal Rescue and Research Program, 290 Summer St., Yarmouth Port, MA, 02675, United States of America.
Brian SharpInternational Fund for Animal Welfare, Marine Mammal Rescue and Research Program, 290 Summer St., Yarmouth Port, MA, 02675, United States of America.
Janelle SchuhAnimal Rescue Program, Sea Research Foundation, 55 Coogan Blvd., Mystic, CT, 06355-1997, United States of America.
Andrew J ReadDivision of Marine Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University of Marine Laboratory, 135 Duke Marine Lab Rd., Beaufort, NC, 28516, United States of America.
International Fund for Animal Welfare · USMarine Conservation Institute · USDuke University · USIntegrated Statistics (United States) · USSea Research Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harbor seals and gray seals are sympatric phocid pinnipeds found in coastal waters of the temperate and sub-Arctic North Atlantic. In the Northwest Atlantic, both species were depleted through a combination of subsistence hunts and government supported bounties, and are now re-occupying substantial portions of their original ranges. While both species appear to have recovered during the past 2 decades, our understanding of their population dynamics in US waters is incomplete. Here we describe trends in stranding and bycatch rates of harbor and gray seals in the North East United States (NEUS) over the past 16 years through an exploratory curve-fitting exercise and structural break-point analysis. Variability in gray seal strandings in Southern New England and bycatch in the Northeast Sink Gillnet Fishery were best described by fitting positive exponential and linear models, and exhibited rates of increase as high as 22%. In contrast, neither linear nor exponential models fit the oscillation of harbor seal strandings and bycatch over the study period. However, a breakpoint Chow test revealed that harbor seal strandings in the Cape Cod, Massachusetts region and harbor seal bycatch in the Northeast Sink Gillnet Fishery increased in the 1990s and then started declining in the early to mid-2000s. Our analysis indicates that ongoing variation in natural and anthropogenic mortality rates of harbor and gray seals in the NEUS is not synchronous, and likely represents diverging trends in abundance of these species as they assume new roles in the marine ecosystems of the region.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAtlantic OceanFemaleMaleMassachusettsPhocaPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID26200461
PMCPMC4511798
OpenAlexW2149463474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.