Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26200428›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

Viral dark matter and virus-host interactions resolved from publicly available microbial genomes.

Simon Roux, Steven J Hallam, Tanja Woyke, Matthew B Sullivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 298 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
298citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

298 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Revisiting the life cycle of temperate phages.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prophage: agent provocateur?Archives of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

238 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simon RouxDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States.
Steven J HallamDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Tanja WoykeU.S Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, United States.
Matthew B SullivanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ecological importance of viruses is now widely recognized, yet our limited knowledge of viral sequence space and virus-host interactions precludes accurate prediction of their roles and impacts. In this study, we mined publicly available bacterial and archaeal genomic data sets to identify 12,498 high-confidence viral genomes linked to their microbial hosts. These data augment public data sets 10-fold, provide first viral sequences for 13 new bacterial phyla including ecologically abundant phyla, and help taxonomically identify 7-38% of 'unknown' sequence space in viromes. Genome- and network-based classification was largely consistent with accepted viral taxonomy and suggested that (i) 264 new viral genera were identified (doubling known genera) and (ii) cross-taxon genomic recombination is limited. Further analyses provided empirical data on extrachromosomal prophages and coinfection prevalences, as well as evaluation of in silico virus-host linkage predictions. Together these findings illustrate the value of mining viral signal from microbial genomes.

Indexed as

Genome, MicrobialHost-Pathogen InteractionsArchaeaBacteriaVirusesecologyevolutionary biologygenomicsnonephageprophagevirusvirus-host adaptation

Identifiers

PMID26200428
PMCPMC4533152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.