Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26200232›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2015

Recovery of Walking Ability and Return to Community Living within 60 Days of Hip Fracture Does Not Differ Between Male and Female Survivors.

Lauren A Beaupre, Jeffrey L Carson, Helaine Noveck, Jay Magaziner

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sex differences in recovery of quality of life 12 months post-fracture in community-dwelling older adults: analyses of the Australian arm of the International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (AusICUROS).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Resiliency Groups Following Hip Fracture in Older Adults.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren A BeaupreDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jeffrey L CarsonRutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Helaine NoveckDivision of General Internal Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Jay MagazinerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johnson University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

University of Maryland Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (UM-OAIC)P30AG028747 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Stephen L. Seliger · 2006 to 2026
$28.9M
FOCUS-Detection of Myocardial InfarctionU01HL073958 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI CARSON, JEFFREY LEE · 2003 to 2011
$8.6M
FOCUS Data Coordinating CenterU01HL074815 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI TERRIN, MICHAEL L · 2003 to 2010
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL073958NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL074815NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare risk-adjusted differences between men and women 30 and 60 days after hip fracture surgery in not walking, ability to return home in a community-dwelling subset, not walking in a nursing home resident subset, and mortality within 60 days.

designCohort study.

settingData were from a randomized clinical trial that compared two blood transfusion protocols after hip fracture.

participantsIndividuals with hip fracture (N = 2,016; 489 (24%) male). MEASUREMENTS: Walking, dwelling, and mortality were determined in telephone follow-up 30 and 60 days after randomization, which occurred within 3 days of surgery. Sex differences for each outcome were compared using univariate and multivariate regression adjusting for potential confounders.

resultsMen were younger (P < .001) and more likely to have comorbidity (P = .003) than women at the time of hip fracture and to die within 60 days, even after risk adjustment (odds ratio (OR) = 1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15-2.69). After risk adjustment, male survivors were as likely as female survivors not to walk (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.78-1.34) and no less likely to return home (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.69-1.17) 60 days after hip fracture. No differences were noted between male and female nursing home residents in not walking within 60 days (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.32-2.86).

conclusionAlthough men experience higher mortality, male survivors can expect recovery of walking ability similar to that of female survivors and are as likely to return to community living.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overBlood TransfusionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGeriatric AssessmentHip FracturesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing HomesPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsfunctional recoveryhip fracturesex differences

Identifiers

PMID26200232
PMCPMC4610808
OpenAlexW1818168674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.