Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26200138›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2015

The brain and the braincase: a spatial analysis on the midsagittal profile in adult humans.

Emiliano Bruner, Hideki Amano, José Manuel de la Cuétara, Naomichi Ogihara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. MultimodalFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Evidence for independent brain and neurocranial reorganization during hominin evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The language-ready head: Evolutionary considerations.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emiliano BrunerCentro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana, Burgos, Spain.
Hideki AmanoKeio University, Yokohama, Japan.
José Manuel de la CuétaraUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Naomichi OgiharaKeio University, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN MORRIS · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERP50AG005681 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FAGAN, ANNE · 1985 to 2019
$52.1M
ULTRAHIGH FIELD TECHNOLOGY FOR FUNCTIONAL IMAGINGP41RR014075 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BOAS, DAVID A · 1999 to 2011
$16.4M
STRUCTURE, FUNCTION AND COGNITION IN SCHIZOPHRENIAP50MH071616 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARCH, DEANNA · 2004 to 2008
$11.2M
Automated Analysis of Healthy and Diseased Brain TissueR01RR016594 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FISCHL, BRUCE · 2002 to 2005
$1.7M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR014075NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR016594NCRR NIH HHS RR14075NCRR NIH HHS RR16594NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01AG03991NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005681NIA NIH HHS P50AG05681NIMH NIH HHS P20MH071616NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH071616PHS HHS BIRN002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spatial relationships between brain and braincase represent a major topic in surgery and evolutionary neuroanatomy. In paleoneurology, neurocranial landmarks are often used as references for brain areas. In this study, we analyze the variation and covariation of midsagittal brain and skull coordinates in a sample of adult modern humans in order to demonstrate spatial associations between hard and soft tissues. The correlation between parietal lobe size and parietal bone size is very low, and there is a marked individual variation. The distances between lobes and bones are partially influenced by the dimensions of the parietal lobes. The main pattern of morphological variability among individuals, associated with the size of the precuneus, apparently does not influence the position of the neurocranial sutures. Therefore, variations in precuneal size modify the distance between the paracentral lobule and bregma, and between the parietal lobe and lambda. Hence, the relative position of the cranial and cerebral landmarks can change as a function of the parietal dimensions. The slight correlation and covariation among these elements suggests a limited degree of spatial integration between soft and hard tissues. Therefore, although the brain influences the cranial size and shape during morphogenesis, the specific position of the cerebral components is sensitive to multiple effects and local factors, without a strict correspondence with the bone landmarks. This absence of correspondent change between brain and skull boundaries suggests caution when making inferences about the brain areas from the position of the cranial sutures. The fact that spatial relationships between cranial and brain areas may vary according to brain proportions must be considered in paleoneurology, when brain anatomy is inferred from cranial evidence.

Indexed as

AdultAnatomic LandmarksBiological EvolutionFemaleFossilsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOrgan SizeParietal BoneParietal LobeYoung Adultgeometric morphometricsneuroanatomypaleoneurologyparietal lobesprecuneusvault

Identifiers

PMID26200138
PMCPMC4560561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.