ArticleJournal of anatomy2015
The brain and the braincase: a spatial analysis on the midsagittal profile in adult humans.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postnatal interaction of size and shape in the human endocranium and brain structures.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Morphological variations and cortical atrophy of the precuneus in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Growth and development of the precuneus in humans from birth to early adulthood.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Mathematical and Dynamic Modeling of the Anatomical Localization of the Insula in the Brain.Neuroinformatics · 2025Review
- An inclusive anatomical network analysis of human craniocerebral topology.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- What do brain endocasts tell us? A comparative analysis of the accuracy of sulcal identification by experts and perspectives in palaeoanthropology.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
- Dumbbell-shaped brains of Polish crested chickens as a model system for the evolution of novel brain morphologies.Journal of anatomy · 2023Article
- The parietal lobe evolution and the emergence of material culture in the human genus.Brain structure & function · 2023Review
- Craniofacial orientation and parietal bone morphology in adult modern humans.Journal of anatomy · 2022Article
- MultimodalFrontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Ventral-Dorsal Subregions in the Posterior Cingulate Cortex Represent Pay and Interest, Two Key Attributes of Job Value.Cerebral cortex communications · 2021Article
- Evidence for independent brain and neurocranial reorganization during hominin evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Are endocasts good proxies for brain size and shape in archosaurs throughout ontogeny?Journal of anatomy · 2019Article
- The evolution of modern human brain shape.Science advances · 2018Article
- Article
- Shape analysis of spatial relationships between orbito-ocular and endocranial structures in modern humans and fossil hominids.Journal of anatomy · 2017Article
- Evidence for expansion of the precuneus in human evolution.Brain structure & function · 2017Article
- The language-ready head: Evolutionary considerations.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2017Review
- Integration of Brain and Skull in Prenatal Mouse Models of Apert and Crouzon Syndromes.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
- Effects of cranial integration on hominid endocranial shape.Journal of anatomy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The spatial relationships between brain and braincase represent a major topic in surgery and evolutionary neuroanatomy. In paleoneurology, neurocranial landmarks are often used as references for brain areas. In this study, we analyze the variation and covariation of midsagittal brain and skull coordinates in a sample of adult modern humans in order to demonstrate spatial associations between hard and soft tissues. The correlation between parietal lobe size and parietal bone size is very low, and there is a marked individual variation. The distances between lobes and bones are partially influenced by the dimensions of the parietal lobes. The main pattern of morphological variability among individuals, associated with the size of the precuneus, apparently does not influence the position of the neurocranial sutures. Therefore, variations in precuneal size modify the distance between the paracentral lobule and bregma, and between the parietal lobe and lambda. Hence, the relative position of the cranial and cerebral landmarks can change as a function of the parietal dimensions. The slight correlation and covariation among these elements suggests a limited degree of spatial integration between soft and hard tissues. Therefore, although the brain influences the cranial size and shape during morphogenesis, the specific position of the cerebral components is sensitive to multiple effects and local factors, without a strict correspondence with the bone landmarks. This absence of correspondent change between brain and skull boundaries suggests caution when making inferences about the brain areas from the position of the cranial sutures. The fact that spatial relationships between cranial and brain areas may vary according to brain proportions must be considered in paleoneurology, when brain anatomy is inferred from cranial evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.