Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26199850›Full record

ArticleBeilstein journal of nanotechnology2015

Atomic force microscopy as analytical tool to study physico-mechanical properties of intestinal cells.

Christa Schimpel, Oliver Werzer, Eleonore Fröhlich, Gerd Leitinger, Markus Absenger-Novak, Birgit Teubl, Andreas Zimmer, Eva Roblegg

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beilstein journal of nanotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advanced atomic force microscopy techniques III.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christa SchimpelInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, NAWI Graz, Karl-Franzens-University of Graz, BioTechMed-Graz, Austria.
Oliver WerzerInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, NAWI Graz, Karl-Franzens-University of Graz, BioTechMed-Graz, Austria.
Eleonore FröhlichMedical University of Graz, Center for Medical Research, BioTechMed-Graz, Austria.
Gerd LeitingerResearch Unit Electron Microscopic Techniques, Institute of Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology, Center for Medical Research, Medical University of Graz, BioTechMed-Graz, Austria.
Markus Absenger-NovakMedical University of Graz, Center for Medical Research, BioTechMed-Graz, Austria.
Birgit TeublInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, NAWI Graz, Karl-Franzens-University of Graz, BioTechMed-Graz, Austria.
Andreas ZimmerInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, NAWI Graz, Karl-Franzens-University of Graz, BioTechMed-Graz, Austria.
Eva RobleggInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, NAWI Graz, Karl-Franzens-University of Graz, BioTechMed-Graz, Austria ; Research Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Graz, Austria.
University of Graz · ATBioTechMed-Graz · ATMedical University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The small intestine is a complex system that carries out various functions. The main function of enterocytes is absorption of nutrients, whereas membranous cells (M cells) are responsible for delivering antigens/foreign substances to the mucosal lymphoid tissues. However, to get a fundamental understanding of how cellular structures contribute to physiological processes, precise knowledge about surface morphologies, cytoskeleton organizations and biomechanical properties is necessary. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used here as a powerful tool to study surface topographies of Caco-2 cells and M cells. Furthermore, cell elasticity (i.e., the mechanical response of a cell on a tip indentation), was elucidated by force curve measurements. Besides elasticity, adhesion was evaluated by recording the attraction and repulsion forces between the tip and the cell surface. Organization of F-actin networks were investigated via phalloidin labeling and visualization was performed with confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results of these various experimental techniques revealed significant differences in the cytoskeleton/microvilli arrangements and F-actin organization. Caco-2 cells displayed densely packed F-actin bundles covering the entire cell surface, indicating the formation of a well-differentiated brush border. In contrast, in M cells actins were arranged as short and/or truncated thin villi, only available at the cell edge. The elasticity of M cells was 1.7-fold higher compared to Caco-2 cells and increased significantly from the cell periphery to the nuclear region. Since elasticity can be directly linked to cell adhesion, M cells showed higher adhesion forces than Caco-2 cells. The combination of distinct experimental techniques shows that morphological differences between Caco-2 cells and M cells correlate with mechanical cell properties and provide useful information to understand physiological processes/mechanisms in the small intestine.

Indexed as

atomic force microscopyCaco-2 cellselasticityM cellsmechanical properties

Identifiers

PMID26199850
PMCPMC4505173
OpenAlexW923412053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.