Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26199688›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of pediatrics2015

Application of Lidocaine Spray for Tracheal Intubation in Neonates - A Clinical Trial Study.

Mirhadi Mussavi, Khairollah Asadollahi, Ghobad Abangah, Sirus Saradar, Naser Abbasi, Fereidon Zanjani, Mahsa Aminizade

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mirhadi MussaviDepartment of Pediatrics,Pediatric research center, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran.
Khairollah AsadollahiDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, IR Iran ; Research Centre for Psychosocial Injuries, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, IR Iran.
Ghobad AbangahDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, IR Iran.
Sirus SaradarDepartment of Pediatrics,Pediatric research center, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran.
Naser AbbasiDepartment of Pharmacology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.
Fereidon ZanjaniDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran.
Mahsa AminizadeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRIlam University · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRMedical University of Ilam · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTracheal intubation is extremely distressing, painful, and may influence heart rate and blood pressure. Sedatives, analgesics, and muscle relaxants are not commonly used for intubation in neonates.

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of lidocaine spray as a non-intravenous drug before neonatal intubation on blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and time of intubation. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn a randomized, controlled study each neonate was randomly assigned to one of the two study groups by staffs who were not involved in the infant's care. The allocation concealment was kept in an opaque sealed envelope, and the investigators, the patient care team, and the assessors were blinded to the treatment allocation. The selected setting was NICU unit of a teaching hospital in Ilam city, Iran and participants were 60 neonates with indication of tracheal intubation with gestational age > 30 weeks. Patients in the treatment group received lidocaine spray and the placebo group received spray of normal saline prior to intubation. Main outcome measurements were the mean rates of blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, intubation time and lidocaine side effects were measured before and after intubation.

resultsTotally 60 newborns including 31 boys and 29 girls were entered into the study (drug group n = 30; placebo group n = 30). Boy/girl ratio in treatment and placebo groups were 1.3 and 0.88, respectively. Mean age ± SD of participants was 34.1 ± 24.8 hours (treatment: 35.3 ± 25.7; placebo: 32.9 ± 24.3; P < 0.0001). Mean weight ± SD of neonates was 2012.5 ± 969 g. Application of lidocaine spray caused a significant reduction of mean intubation time among treatment group compared with placebo group (treatment: 15.03 ± 2.2 seconds; placebo: 18.3 ± 2.3 seconds; P < 0.0001). Mean blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation rate, among neonates in treatment group was reduced after intubation compared with their relevant figures before intubation; however, their differences were not statistically significant except for mean oxygen saturation rate that was reduced significantly in placebo group. No side effects were observed during study.

conclusionsThough the current study revealed some promising results in the application of lidocaine spray during neonatal intubation without any considerable side effects; however, the current investigation could only be considered as a pilot study for further attempts in different locations with higher sample sizes and in different situations.

Indexed as

Intratracheal IntubationLidocaine SprayNeonate

Identifiers

PMID26199688
PMCPMC4505970
OpenAlexW2069645950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.