Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26199640›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2015

The global variability of diatomaceous earth toxicity: a physicochemical and in vitro investigation.

C Nattrass, C J Horwell, D E Damby, A Kermanizadeh, D M Brown, V Stone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

C NattrassInstitute of Hazard, Risk & Resilience, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE UK.
C J HorwellInstitute of Hazard, Risk & Resilience, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE UK.
D E DambyDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, 80333 Germany.
A KermanizadehSchool of Life Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS UK ; Department of Public Health, Section of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-1014 Denmark.
D M BrownSchool of Life Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS UK.
V StoneSchool of Life Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS UK.
Durham University · GBHeriot-Watt University · GBLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiatomaceous earth (DE) is mined globally and is potentially of occupational respiratory health concern due to the high crystalline silica content in processed material. DE toxicity, in terms of variability related to global source and processing technique, is poorly understood. This study addresses this variability using physicochemical characterisation and in vitro toxicology assays.

methodsNineteen DE samples sourced from around the world, comprising unprocessed, calcined and flux-calcined DE, were analysed for chemical and mineral composition, particle size and morphology, and surface area. The potential toxicity of DE was assessed by its haemolytic capacity, and its ability to induce cytotoxicity or cytokine release by J774 macrophages.

resultsThe potential toxicity of DE varied with source and processing technique, ranging from non-reactive to as cytotoxic and haemolytic as DQ12. Crystalline silica-rich, flux-calcined samples were all unreactive, regardless of source. The potential toxicity of unprocessed and calcined samples was variable, and did not correlate with crystalline silica content. Calcium-rich phases, iron content, amorphous material, particle size and morphology all appeared to play a role in sample reactivity. An increased surface area was linked to an increased reactivity in vitro for some sample types.

conclusionsOverall, no single property of DE could be linked to its potential toxicity, but crystalline silica content was not a dominant factor. Occlusion of the potentially toxic crystalline silica surface by an amorphous matrix or other minerals and impurities in the crystal structure are suggested to pacify toxicity in these samples. In vivo verification is required, but these data suggest that crystalline silica content alone is not a sufficient indicator of the potential DE hazard.

Indexed as

CristobaliteCrystalline silicaCytotoxicityDiatomaceous earthHaemolysisVariability

Identifiers

PMID26199640
PMCPMC4509483
OpenAlexW1891048646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.