Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26199609›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2015

Curcumin improves synaptic plasticity impairment induced by HIV-1gp120 V3 loop.

Ling-Ling Shen, Ming-Liang Jiang, Si-Si Liu, Min-Chun Cai, Zhong-Qiu Hong, Li-Qing Lin, Yan-Yan Xing, Gui-Lin Chen, Rui Pan, Li-Juan Yang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Molecular and functional characterization of an evolutionarily conserved CREB-binding protein in the Lymnaea CNS.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Neural regeneration research · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ling-Ling ShenDepartment of Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Ming-Liang JiangDepartment of Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China ; GHM Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Si-Si LiuDepartment of Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China ; GHM Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Min-Chun CaiDepartment of Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Zhong-Qiu HongDepartment of Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Li-Qing LinDepartment of Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China ; GHM Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Yan-Yan XingDepartment of Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China ; GHM Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Gui-Lin ChenDepartment of Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China ; GHM Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Rui PanDepartment of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Li-Juan YangDepartment of Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China ; GHM Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Ying XuGHM Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Jun DongDepartment of Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China ; GHM Institute of CNS Regeneration, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Jinan University · CNState Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of the People's Republic of China · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Curcumin has been shown to significantly improve spatial memory impairment induced by HIV-1 gp120 V3 in rats, but the electrophysiological mechanism remains unknown. Using extracellular microelectrode recording techniques, this study confirmed that the gp120 V3 loop could suppress long-term potentiation in the rat hippocampal CA1 region and synaptic plasticity, and that curcumin could antagonize these inhibitory effects. Using a Fura-2/AM calcium ion probe, we found that curcumin resisted the effects of the gp120 V3 loop on hippocampal synaptosomes and decreased Ca(2+) concentration in synaptosomes. This effect of curcumin was identical to nimodipine, suggesting that curcumin improved the inhibitory effects of gp120 on synaptic plasticity, ameliorated damage caused to the central nervous system, and might be a potential neuroprotective drug.

Indexed as

Ca2+curcuminexcitatory postsynaptic potentialHIV-1 gp120 V3 loopHIV-associated neurocognitive disorderslong-term potentiationnerve regenerationneural regenerationneuronsNSFC grantsoutput/input curvepaired-pulse facilitationplasticitysynaptosome

Identifiers

PMID26199609
PMCPMC4498354
OpenAlexW752224552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.