Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26199066›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2016

Experience matters: long-term results of pulmonary vein isolation using a robotic navigation system for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Andreas Rillig, Tina Lin, Boris Schmidt, Britta Feige, Christian Heeger, Jascha Wegner, Erik Wissner, Andreas Metzner, Anita Arya, Shibu Mathew and 4 more

Abstract readComparative StudyControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical scores for outcomes of rhythm control or arrhythmia progression in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Contact force facilitates the achievement of an unexcitable ablation line during pulmonary vein isolation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2018
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Left atrial anterior line ablation using ablation index and inter-lesion distance measurement.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019
    Article
  5. Remote vs. conventional navigation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from prospective registry data.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Ablation of very late recurrence after initially successful ablation of atrial fibrillation.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. First clinical experience using a novel high-resolution electroanatomical mapping system for left atrial ablation procedures.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas RilligDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany. arillig5@yahoo.de.
Tina LinDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany.
Boris SchmidtDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany.
Britta FeigeDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian HeegerDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany.
Jascha WegnerDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany.
Erik WissnerDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas MetznerDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany.
Anita AryaDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany.
Shibu MathewDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany.
Peter WohlmuthAsklepios proresearch, Hamburg, Germany.
Feifan OuyangDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany.
Karl-Heinz KuckDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany.
Roland Richard TilzDepartment of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany.
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg · DEAsklepios · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term results after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) using a robotic navigation system (RNS) have not yet been reported.

objectiveTo evaluate long-term results of patients with PAF after CPVI using RNS.

methodsIn this study, 200 patients (n = 151 (75.5%) male; median age 62.2 (54.7-67.7) years) with PAF were evaluated. In 100 patients, RNS (RN-group) was used for CPVI and compared to 100 manually ablated control patients (MN-group). Radiofrequency was used in conjunction with 3D electroanatomic mapping. Power was limited to 30 watts (W) at the posterior left atrial (LA) wall in the first 49 RNS patients (RN-group-a). After esophageal perforation occurred in one RN-group-a patient, maximum power was reduced to 20 W for the subsequent 51 patients (RN-group-b).

resultsAfter a median follow-up of 2 years, single (77/100 vs 77/100, p = 0.89) and multiple (90/100 vs 93/100, p = 0.29) procedure success rates were comparable between RN-group and MN-group. Single procedure success rate was significantly lower in RN-group-a as compared to RN-group-b (65.3 vs 88.2%, p = 0.047). In RN-group-a patients, procedural times [200 (170-230) vs 152 (132-200) minutes, p < 0.01] and fluoroscopy times [16.6 (12.9-21.6) minutes vs 13.7 (9.5-19) minutes, p = 0.043] were significantly longer compared to RN-group-b patients.

conclusionLong-term success rate after CPVI using RNS was comparable to manual ablation. Despite a lower power limit of 20 W at the posterior LA wall, single procedure success rate was higher in RN-group-b as compared to RN-group-a. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time decreased, whilst success rate increased with increasing experience in the RN-group.

Indexed as

AgedAtrial FibrillationCatheter AblationFemaleFluoroscopyFollow-Up StudiesHeart AtriaHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPulmonary VeinsRoboticsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCatheter ablationLearning effectLong-term outcomeParoxysmal atrial fibrillationPulmonary vein isolationRobotic navigation

Identifiers

PMID26199066
OpenAlexW2113515831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.