ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2015
Application of "Omics" Technologies for Diagnosis and Pathogenesis of Neurological Infections.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Novel techniques for the diagnosis of neurological infections.Current opinion in neurology · 2025Review
- Network analysis of plasma proteomes in affective disorders.Translational psychiatry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infections of the human nervous system have substantial morbidity and mortality but also represent among the most challenging of all neurological diseases because of the difficulty in establishing a diagnosis and implementing effective therapies. Neurological infections lead to altered expression levels of a wide range of host- and pathogen-derived biomolecules both within and outside of the nervous system. Quantitative analyses of these biomolecular perturbations have been traditionally performed using "classical" molecular or analytical methods, which evaluate one or few genes or their products at a time. Recent technical developments together with the increasing availability of high-throughput/content methodologies have enabled a more comprehensive overview of these molecular alterations and thus provide new approaches to the diagnosis and/or treatment of this group of disorders. Herein, we will review recent evidence pointing to the capacity of the so-called omics techniques in studying the nervous system infections with an emphasis on genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26198887What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.