Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26198656›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2015

An image-based method to quantify biomechanical properties of the rectum in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Oscar Casares-Magaz, Maria Thor, Donghua Liao, Jens B Frøkjær, Pia Kræmer, Klaus Krogh, Asbjørn M Drewes, Hans Gregersen, Vitali Moiseenko, Morten Høyer and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Novel Bionics Assessment of Anorectal Mechanosensory Physiology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Oscar Casares-Magaza Department of Medical Physics , Aarhus University Hospital/Aarhus University , Denmark.
Maria Thorb Department of Medical Physics , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , USA.
Donghua Liaoc GIOME Academia, Department of Clinical Medicine , Aarhus University , Denmark.
Jens B Frøkjærd Department of Clinical Medicine , Aalborg University Hospital , Denmark.
Pia Kræmerf Department of Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital/Aarhus University , Denmark.
Klaus Kroghg Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology , Aarhus University Hospital/Aarhus University , Denmark.
Asbjørn M Drewesd Department of Clinical Medicine , Aalborg University Hospital , Denmark.
Hans Gregerseni GIOME, College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University , Chongqing , China.
Vitali Moiseenkoj Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Science , University of California San Diego , San Diego , USA.
Morten Høyerf Department of Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital/Aarhus University , Denmark.
Ludvig P Murena Department of Medical Physics , Aarhus University Hospital/Aarhus University , Denmark.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastrointestinal morbidity after radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer may be related to the biomechanical properties of the rectum. In this study we present a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based method to quantitate the thickness and elasticity of the rectal wall in prostate cancer patients treated with RT. MATERIAL AND

methodsFour patients previously treated with RT for prostate cancer underwent an MRI session with stepwise rectal bag deflation (from a maximum tolerable volume to 0 ml, in 50 ml steps), with a probe inserted inside the bag to monitor the internal rectal pressure. MRIs were acquired using Dixon sequences (4 mm axial slice thickness) at each deflation step. Rectal walls were defined from the recto-sigmoid junction to 3 cm above the anal canal as the space between the inner and outer wall surfaces. The wall thickness was determined and biomechanical properties (strain and stress) were calculated from the pressure measurements and the MRI-segmented rectal walls.

resultsThe integral rectal pressure varied for the maximum tolerable volume (range 150-250 ml) across patients and ranged from 1.3 to 4.0 kPa (SD = 1.2 kPa). Wall thickness was found to vary between patients and also across different rectum segments, with a mean (SD) thickness for the different segments at the 50 ml distension volume of 1.8-4.0 (0.6) mm. Stress showed larger variation than strain, with mean (SD) values for the different segments ranging between 1.5 and 7.0 (1.5) kPa.

conclusionWe have developed a method to quantify biomechanical properties of the rectal wall. The resulting rectal wall thickness, strain and stress differed between patients, as well as across different rectal wall sections. These findings could provide guidance in future predictive outcome modelling in order to better understand the rectal dose-volume response relationship.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesRectum

Identifiers

PMID26198656
PMCPMC6628909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.