Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26198426›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2015

Impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and its responsiveness to pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with moderate to very severe COPD: protocol of the Chance study.

Dionne E Smid, Sarah Wilke, Paul W Jones, Jean W M Muris, Emiel F M Wouters, Frits M E Franssen, Martijn A Spruit

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Lung Hyperinflation as Treatable Trait in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gender differences in partners of patients with COPD and their perceptions about the patients.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Sputum microbiology predicts health status in COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dionne E SmidDepartment of Research & Education, CIRO, Horn, The Netherlands.
Sarah WilkeDepartment of Research & Education, CIRO, Horn, The Netherlands.
Paul W JonesDivision of Clinical Science, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Jean W M MurisDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School of Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8780-476X
Emiel F M WoutersDepartment of Research & Education, CIRO, Horn, The Netherlands Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frits M E FranssenDepartment of Research & Education, CIRO, Horn, The Netherlands Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Martijn A SpruitDepartment of Research & Education, CIRO, Horn, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Patients with COPD are characterised by a reduced health status, which can be easily assessed by the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Previous studies show that health status can be worsened by the presence of comorbidities. However, the impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on health status as assessed with CAT is not sufficiently investigated. Therefore, the current study has the following objectives: (1) to study the clinical, (patho)physiological and psychosocial determinants of the CAT, and impact of previously established and/or newly diagnosed cardiovascular comorbidities on health status in tertiary care patients with COPD; (2) to assess the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on CAT scores in patients with COPD; (3) to develop reference values for the CAT in Dutch elderly patients without COPD; and (4) to validate the CAT in a broad sample of Dutch patients with COPD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The COPD, Health status and Comorbidities (Chance) study is a monocentre study consisting of an observational cross-sectional part and a longitudinal part. Demographic and clinical characteristics will be assessed in primary care, secondary care and tertiary care patients with COPD, and in patients without COPD. To assess health status, the CAT, Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) will be used. The longitudinal part consists of a comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation programme in 500 tertiary care patients. For the cross-sectional part of the study, 150 patients without COPD, 100 primary care patients and 100 secondary care patients will be assessed during a single home visit. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Medical Ethical Committee of the Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands (METC 11-3-070), has approved this study. The study has been registered at the Dutch Trial Register (NTR 3416).

Indexed as

Health StatusAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesExercise TherapyFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory TherapyCardiovascular comorbiditiesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseCOPD assessment testHealth status

Identifiers

PMID26198426
PMCPMC4513521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.