Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26198350›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2015

Rethinking HIV prevention to prepare for oral PrEP implementation for young African women.

Connie L Celum, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe, Margaret McConnell, Heidi van Rooyen, Linda-Gail Bekker, Ann Kurth, Elizabeth Bukusi, Chris Desmond, Jennifer Morton, Jared M Baeten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Connie L CelumDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA.
Sinead Delany-MoretlweWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Margaret McConnellDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Boston, MA, USA.
Heidi van RooyenHuman Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
Linda-Gail BekkerThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ann KurthCollege of Nursing, New York University New York, NY, USA.
Elizabeth BukusiKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Chris DesmondHuman Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
Jennifer MortonDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA.
Jared M BaetenDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USHuman Sciences Research Council · ZAHarvard Global Health Institute · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KENew York University · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHIV incidence remains high among young women in sub-Saharan Africa in spite of scale-up of HIV testing, behavioural interventions, antiretroviral treatment and medical male circumcision. There is a critical need to critique past approaches and learn about the most effective implementation of evidence-based HIV prevention strategies, particularly emerging interventions such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). DISCUSSION: Women in sub-Saharan Africa are at increased risk of HIV during adolescence and into their 20s, in part due to contextual factors including gender norms and relationship dynamics, and limited access to reproductive and sexual health services. We reviewed behavioural, behavioural economic and biomedical approaches to HIV prevention for young African women, with a particular focus on the barriers, opportunities and implications for implementing PrEP in this group. Behavioural interventions have had limited impact in part due to not effectively addressing the context, broader sexual norms and expectations, and structural factors that increase risk and vulnerability. Of biomedical HIV prevention strategies that have been tested, daily oral PrEP has the greatest evidence for protection, although adherence was low in two placebo-controlled trials in young African women. Given high efficacy and effectiveness in other populations, demonstration projects of open-label PrEP in young African women are needed to determine the most effective delivery models and whether women at substantial risk are motivated and able to use oral PrEP with sufficient adherence to achieve HIV prevention benefits.

conclusionsSocial marketing, adherence support and behavioural economic interventions should be evaluated as part of PrEP demonstration projects among young African women in terms of their effectiveness in increasing demand and optimizing uptake and effective use of PrEP. Lessons learned through evaluations of implementation strategies for delivering oral PrEP, a first-generation biomedical HIV prevention product, will inform development of new and less user-dependent PrEP formulations and delivery of an expanding choice of prevention options in HIV prevention programmes for young African women.

Indexed as

Pre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAfricaAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansAnti-HIV AgentsAfricaHIVpre-exposure prophylaxispreventionwomen

Identifiers

PMID26198350
PMCPMC4509892
OpenAlexW1824553021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.