Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26198341›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2015

The promises and challenges of pre-exposure prophylaxis as part of the emerging paradigm of combination HIV prevention.

Carlos F Cáceres, Florence Koechlin, Pedro Goicochea, Papa-Salif Sow, Kevin R O'Reilly, Kenneth H Mayer, Peter Godfrey-Faussett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Barriers and Facilitators to PrEP Initiation and Adherence Among Transgender and Gender Non-Binary Individuals in Southern California.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlos F CáceresCenter for Interdisciplinary Studies in Sexuality, AIDS and Society, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Florence KoechlinHIV Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pedro GoicocheaNetwork for Multidisciplinary Studies in ARV-Based HIV Prevention (NEMUS), Lima, Peru.
Papa-Salif SowThe Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kevin R O'ReillyHIV Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kenneth H MayerThe Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Peter Godfrey-FaussettJoint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Syphilis: Translating technology to understand a neglected epidemicR01AI099727 · NIAID · UNIVERSIDAD PERUANA CAYETANO HEREDIA · PI CACERES, CARLOS F. · 2012 to 2016
$1.1M
DEVELOPING A STATE-OF-THE-ART COMBINATION HIV PREVENTION PROGRAM FOR MSM/TRANSWOMR21MH102135 · NIMH · UNIVERSIDAD PERUANA CAYETANO HEREDIA · PI CACERES, CARLOS F. · 2013 to 2014
$297k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI099727NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH102135World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTowards the end of the twentieth century, significant success was achieved in reducing incidence in several global HIV epidemics through ongoing prevention strategies. However, further progress in risk reduction was uncertain. For one thing, it was clear that social vulnerability had to be addressed, through research on interventions addressing health systems and other structural barriers. As soon as antiretroviral treatment became available, researchers started to conceive that antiretrovirals might play a role in decreasing either susceptibility in uninfected people or infectiousness among people living with HIV. In this paper we focus on the origin, present status, and potential contribution of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) within the combination HIV prevention framework. DISCUSSION: After a phase of controversy, PrEP efficacy trials took off. By 2015, daily oral PrEP, using tenofovir alone or in combination with emtricitabine, has been proven efficacious, though efficacy seems heavily contingent upon adherence to pill uptake. Initial demonstration projects after release of efficacy results have shown that PrEP can be implemented in real settings and adherence can be high, leading to high effectiveness. Despite its substantial potential, beliefs persist about unfeasibility in real-life settings due to stigma, cost, adherence, and potential risk compensation barriers.

conclusionsThe strategic synergy of behavioural change communication, biomedical strategies (including PrEP), and structural programmes is providing the basis for the combination HIV prevention framework. If PrEP is to ever become a key component of that framework, several negative beliefs must be confronted based on emerging evidence; moreover, research gaps regarding PrEP implementation must be filled, and appropriate prioritization strategies must be set up. Those challenges are significant, proportional to the impact that PrEP implementation may have in the global response to HIV.

Indexed as

Pre-Exposure ProphylaxisAnti-HIV AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationEmtricitabineHIV InfectionsHumansTenofovirAnti-HIV AgentsEmtricitabineTenofovirantiretroviralshealth policyHIV preventionpre-exposure prophylaxispublic health

Identifiers

PMID26198341
PMCPMC4509895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.