Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26198303›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

OrderRex: clinical order decision support and outcome predictions by data-mining electronic medical records.

Jonathan H Chen, Tanya Podchiyska, Russ B Altman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Avoiding Biased Clinical Machine Learning Model Performance Estimates in the Presence of Label Selection.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The bird's-eye view: A data-driven approach to understanding patient journeys from claims data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Physician Usage and Acceptance of a Machine Learning Recommender System for Simulated Clinical Order Entry.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan H ChenCenter for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research (PCOR), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Tanya PodchiyskaBiomedical Informatics Training Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Russ B AltmanDepartments of Bioengineering, Genetics, and Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA russ.altman@stanford.edu.

Funding

Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
PharmGKB: pharmacogenomics knowledge for precision medicineR24GM061374 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO, KLEIN, TERI ELLEN · 2010 to 2018
$25.2M
Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Education and Research (SCCTER)UL1UL1RR025744 · NCRR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2008 to 2011
$22.4M
Text Mining for High-fidelity Curation and Discovery of Gene-drug-phenotype RelationshipsR01LM005652 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 2000 to 2018
$6.2M
Undergraduate Summer Research Experiences Support for Combining systems biology and structural biology to find new therapeuticsR01GM102365 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 2012 to 2021
$3.0M
Data-Mining Clinical Decision Support from Electronic Health RecordsK01ES026837 · NIEHS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, JONATHAN H. · 2015 to 2019
$893k
MODELING AND COMPUTING WITH UNCERTAIN STRUCTURESR29LM005652 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 1994 to 1998
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025744NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES026837NIGMS NIH HHS GM102365NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102365NIGMS NIH HHS R24GM61374NLM NIH HHS LM05652NLM NIH HHS R01 LM005652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo answer a "grand challenge" in clinical decision support, the authors produced a recommender system that automatically data-mines inpatient decision support from electronic medical records (EMR), analogous to Netflix or Amazon.com's product recommender. MATERIALS AND

methodsEMR data were extracted from 1 year of hospitalizations (>18K patients with >5.4M structured items including clinical orders, lab results, and diagnosis codes). Association statistics were counted for the ∼1.5K most common items to drive an order recommender. The authors assessed the recommender's ability to predict hospital admission orders and outcomes based on initial encounter data from separate validation patients.

resultsCompared to a reference benchmark of using the overall most common orders, the recommender using temporal relationships improves precision at 10 recommendations from 33% to 38% (P < 10(-10)) for hospital admission orders. Relative risk-based association methods improve inverse frequency weighted recall from 4% to 16% (P < 10(-16)). The framework yields a prediction receiver operating characteristic area under curve (c-statistic) of 0.84 for 30 day mortality, 0.84 for 1 week need for ICU life support, 0.80 for 1 week hospital discharge, and 0.68 for 30-day readmission. DISCUSSION: Recommender results quantitatively improve on reference benchmarks and qualitatively appear clinically reasonable. The method assumes that aggregate decision making converges appropriately, but ongoing evaluation is necessary to discern common behaviors from "correct" ones.

conclusionsCollaborative filtering recommender algorithms generate clinical decision support that is predictive of real practice patterns and clinical outcomes. Incorporating temporal relationships improves accuracy. Different evaluation metrics satisfy different goals (predicting likely events vs. "interesting" suggestions).

Indexed as

Data MiningDecision Making, Computer-AssistedDecision Support Systems, ClinicalElectronic Health RecordsAlgorithmsBenchmarkingHumansPatient Admissionclinical decision support systemscollaborative filteringdata-miningelectronic health recordsorder setspractice guidelinespractice variabilityrecommender algorithms

Identifiers

PMID26198303
PMCPMC5009921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.