ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016
Comparison of anastomotic configuration after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy under enhanced recovery program: side-to-side versus end-to-side anastomosis.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison study of two anastomosis techniques in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and pooling up analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of treatment to improve gastrointestinal functions after colorectal surgery within enhanced recovery programmes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Objective recovery time with end-to-side versus side-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Trial
- IsoperistalticWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023Review
- Value of different anastomoses in laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: retrospective study and literature review.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Review
- A comparison of extracorporeal side to side or end to side anastomosis following a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.ANZ journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Ileocolic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy: stapled end-to-side, stapled side-to-side, or handsewn?International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Article
- C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 3 as a predictor of anastomotic leakage after elective right-sided colectomy.Surgery today · 2022Article
- Surgical outcomes according to the type of monopolar electrocautery device used in laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: a comparison of endo-hook versus endo-shears.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Side-to-side versus end-to-side ileocolic anastomosis in right-sided colectomies: A cohort control study.Journal of minimal access surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStapled technique for ileocolic anastomosis is largely supported in previous studies. However, standard anastomotic configuration is not conclusive and studies are limited. This study aims to compare postoperative outcomes between side to side (S-S) and end to side (E-S) stapled anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy underenhanced recovery program (ERP).
methodsBetween October 2009 and November 2012, 89 patients (46 in S-S group, 43 in E-S group) who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer and managed with ERP were included in the study. Recovery time and cumulative recovery rates, the length of hospital stays, complication rates were analyzed to compare both configurations.
resultsThe recovery time were not different between groups (S-S group, 135 hours [84-183.5] vs E-S group, 117 hours [94-143]; P = 0.349). Difference of cumulative recovery rates were observed in postoperative day 7 (S-S group, 71.7 % vs E-S group, 93.0 %; P = 0.019). The postoperative hospital stay were shorter in E-S group (S-S, 7 days [6-9] vs E-S, 6 days [5-7]; P = 0.003). The overall complication rates were lower in E-S group (26.1 % vs 4.6 %; P = 0.008). Anastomotic leakage was not observed in both groups.
conclusionsE-S configuration after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy showed favorable outcomes under enhanced recovery program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.