Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26197935›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2015

Intramuscular anabolic signaling and endocrine response following high volume and high intensity resistance exercise protocols in trained men.

Adam M Gonzalez, Jay R Hoffman, Jeremy R Townsend, Adam R Jajtner, Carleigh H Boone, Kyle S Beyer, Kayla M Baker, Adam J Wells, Gerald T Mangine, Edward H Robinson and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Phase angle, muscle tissue, and resistance training.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Effect of ProHydrolaseSports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adam M GonzalezInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Jay R HoffmanInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA jay.hoffman@ucf.edu.
Jeremy R TownsendInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Adam R JajtnerInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Carleigh H BooneInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Kyle S BeyerInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Kayla M BakerInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Adam J WellsInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Gerald T MangineInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Edward H RobinsonInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
David D ChurchInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Leonardo P OliveiraInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Darryn S WilloughbyExercise and Biochemical Nutrition Laboratory, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.
David H FukudaInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Jeffrey R StoutInstitute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
University of Central Florida · USBaylor University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistance exercise paradigms are often divided into high volume (HV) or high intensity (HI) protocols, however, it is unknown whether these protocols differentially stimulate mTORC1 signaling. The purpose of this study was to examine mTORC1 signaling in conjunction with circulating hormone concentrations following a typical HV and HI lower-body resistance exercise protocol. Ten resistance-trained men (24.7 ± 3.4 years; 90.1 ± 11.3 kg; 176.0 ± 4.9 cm) performed each resistance exercise protocol in a random, counterbalanced order. Blood samples were obtained at baseline (BL), immediately (IP), 30 min (30P), 1 h (1H), 2 h (2H), and 5 h (5H) postexercise. Fine needle muscle biopsies were completed at BL, 1H, and 5H. Electromyography of the vastus lateralis was also recorded during each protocol. HV and HI produced a similar magnitude of muscle activation across sets. Myoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase concentrations were significantly greater following HI compared to HV (P = 0.01-0.02), whereas the lactate response was significantly higher following HV compared to HI (P = 0.003). The growth hormone, cortisol, and insulin responses were significantly greater following HV compared to HI (P = 0.0001-0.04). No significant differences between protocols were observed for the IGF-1 or testosterone response. Intramuscular anabolic signaling analysis revealed a significantly greater (P = 0.03) phosphorylation of IGF-1 receptor at 1H following HV compared to HI. Phosphorylation status of all other signaling proteins including mTOR, p70S6k, and RPS6 were not significantly different between trials. Despite significant differences in markers of muscle damage and the endocrine response following HV and HI, both protocols appeared to elicit similar mTORC1 activation in resistance-trained men.

Indexed as

Hormone hypothesisintensitymTORC1mTOR pathwayvolume

Identifiers

PMID26197935
PMCPMC4552541
OpenAlexW1957733463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.