Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26197726›Full record

ReviewClinical psychology review2015

Network destabilization and transition in depression: New methods for studying the dynamics of therapeutic change.

Adele M Hayes, Carly Yasinski, J Ben Barnes, Claudi L H Bockting

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical psychology review, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrating plasticity into precision psychiatry.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adele M HayesUniversity of Delaware, USA. Electronic address: ahayes@udel.edu.
Carly YasinskiUniversity of Delaware, USA.
J Ben BarnesUniversity of Delaware, USA.
Claudi L H BocktingUniversiteit Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

Trauma-Focused CBT: Potential Mechanisms that Inhibit and Facilitate ChangeR01MH086558 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI HAYES, ADELE · 2010 to 2012
$799k
Cognitive Therapy for Personality DisordersR21MH062662 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI HAYES, ADELE · 2002 to 2004
$519k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086558NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH086558NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH062662NIMH NIH HHS R21-MH062662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The science of dynamic systems is the study of pattern formation and system change. Dynamic systems theory can provide a useful framework for understanding the chronicity of depression and its treatment. We propose a working model of therapeutic change with potential to organize findings from psychopathology and treatment research, suggest new ways to study change, facilitate comparisons across studies, and stimulate treatment innovation. We describe a treatment for depression that we developed to apply principles from dynamic systems theory and then present a program of research to examine the utility of this application. Recent methodological and technological developments are also discussed to further advance the search for mechanisms of therapeutic change.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalPsychological TheoryPsychotherapeutic ProcessesHumansMajor Depressive DisorderChronic depressionCognitive change in depressionDepressionDynamic systems theoryEmotional processing

Identifiers

PMID26197726
PMCPMC4696560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.