Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26197344›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Healthcare Worker Preferences for Active Tuberculosis Case Finding Programs in South Africa: A Best-Worst Scaling Choice Experiment.

Nathan N O'Hara, Lilla Roy, Lyndsay M O'Hara, Jerry M Spiegel, Larry D Lynd, J Mark FitzGerald, Annalee Yassi, Letshego E Nophale, Carlo A Marra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Consumer preferences for food allergen labeling.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nathan N O'HaraSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Lilla RoyCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Lyndsay M O'HaraSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jerry M SpiegelSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Larry D LyndCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Mark FitzGeraldInstitute for Heart and Lung Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Annalee YassiSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Letshego E NophaleDepartment of Community Health, Faculty Of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Carlo A MarraSchool of Pharmacy, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CACentre for Advancing Health Outcomes · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CAUniversity of the Free State · ZA

Funding

CIHR 115212-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHealthcare workers (HCWs) in South Africa are at a high risk of developing active tuberculosis (TB) due to their occupational exposures. This study aimed to systematically quantify and compare the preferred attributes of an active TB case finding program for HCWs in South Africa.

methodsA Best-Worst Scaling choice experiment estimated HCW's preferences using a random-effects conditional logit model. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to explore heterogeneity in preferences.

results"No cost", "the assurance of confidentiality", "no wait" and testing at the occupational health unit at one's hospital were the most preferred attributes. LCA identified a four class model with consistent differences in preference strength. Sex, occupation, and the time since a previous TB test were statistically significant predictors of class membership.

conclusionsThe findings support the strengthening of occupational health units in South Africa to offer free and confidential active TB case finding programs for HCWs with minimal wait times. There is considerable variation in active TB case finding preferences amongst HCWs of different gender, occupation, and testing history. Attention to heterogeneity in preferences should optimize screening utilization of target HCW populations.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelOccupational ExposureAdultChoice BehaviorFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID26197344
PMCPMC4511419
OpenAlexW2256185766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.