Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26197319›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2015

B Cells and Autoantibodies in Multiple Sclerosis.

Anne-Katrin Pröbstel, Nicholas S R Sanderson, Tobias Derfuss

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. High-dimensional immune profiling identifies a biomarker to monitor dimethyl fumarate response in multiple sclerosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Autoantibodies against central nervous system antigens in a subset of B cell-dominant multiple sclerosis patients.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Epstein-Barr Virus and Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. B-cell-targeted therapies in relapsing forms of MS.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne-Katrin PröbstelDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4 & Clinical Neuroimmunology, Hebelstrasse 20, 4031 Basel, Switzerland. anne-katrin.proebstel@usb.ch.
Nicholas S R SandersonDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4 & Clinical Neuroimmunology, Hebelstrasse 20, 4031 Basel, Switzerland. nicholas.sanderson@unibas.ch.
Tobias DerfussDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4 & Clinical Neuroimmunology, Hebelstrasse 20, 4031 Basel, Switzerland. tobias.derfuss@usb.ch.
University Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While over the past decades T cells have been considered key players in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS), it has only recently become evident that B cells have a major contributing role. Our understanding of the role of B cells has evolved substantially following the clinical success of B cell-targeting therapies and increasing experimental evidence for significant B cell involvement. Rather than mere antibody-producing cells, it is becoming clear that they are team players with the capacity to prime and regulate T cells, and function both as pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators. However, despite tremendous efforts, the target antigen(s) of B cells in MS have yet to be identified. The first part of this review summarizes the clinical evidence and results from animal studies pointing to the relevance of B cells in the pathogenesis of MS. The second part gives an overview of the currently known potential autoantigen targets. The third part recapitulates and critically appraises the currently available B cell-directed therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoantibodiesB-LymphocytesHumansImmunotherapyMultiple SclerosisPrecision MedicineAutoantibodiesautoantibodiesautoantigenB cellsmultiple sclerosisneuromyelitis opticapathogenesistherapy

Identifiers

PMID26197319
PMCPMC4519967
OpenAlexW1523937096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.