Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26197035›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2015

Infections with Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and Cytokine Responses in 2 Persons Bitten by Ticks, Sweden.

Anna Grankvist, Lisa Labbé Sandelin, Jennie Andersson, Linda Fryland, Peter Wilhelmsson, Per-Eric Lindgren, Pia Forsberg, Christine Wennerås

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ten years of detecting Neoehrlichia mikurensis infections in Sweden: demographic, clinical and inflammatory parameters.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. RMD open · 2024
    Article
  11. Tick-borne co-infections in Europe: Clinical conundrums.New microbes and new infections · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Human Co-Infections betweenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The emerging tick-borne pathogenEmerging microbes & infections · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Grankvist
Lisa Labbé Sandelin
Jennie Andersson
Linda Fryland
Peter Wilhelmsson
Per-Eric Lindgren
Pia Forsberg
Christine Wennerås
University of Gothenburg · SELandstinget i Kalmar län · SELinköping University · SERyhov Hospital Jönköping · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis infection was determined in 102 persons bitten by ticks in Sweden. Two infected women had erythematous rashes; 1 was co-infected with a Borrelia sp., and the other showed seroconversion for Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Both patients had increased levels of Neoehrlichia DNA and serum cytokines for several months.

Indexed as

TicksAgedAnimalsCandidiasis, CutaneousCoinfectionCytokinesDNA, BacterialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSwedenTick-Borne DiseasesCytokinesDNA, BacterialAnaplasma phagocytophilumAnaplasmataceaebacteriaBorrelia burgdorferi sensu latoCandidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensiscytokine responseserythemaimmunocompetenceSwedentick-borne infectionsticksvector-borne infections

Identifiers

PMID26197035
PMCPMC4517700
OpenAlexW1786380885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.