ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2015
The pediatric heart network: meeting the challenges to multicenter studies in pediatric heart disease.
Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating registry-based trial economics: Results from the STRESS clinical trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2024Article
- Multicenter Clinical Research in Congenital Heart Disease: Leveraging Research Networks to Investigate Important Unanswered Questions.NeoReviews · 2023Review
- Visualization and Quantification of the Unrepaired Complete Atrioventricular Canal Valve Using Open-Source Software.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2022Article
- Recruitment, retention, and adherence in a clinical trial: The Pediatric Heart Network's Marfan Trial experience.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2020Article
- The Pediatric Heart Network Scholar Award programme: a unique mentored award embedded within a multicentre network.Cardiology in the young · 2018Article
- Pre-operative neurodevelopmental assessment in young children undergoing cardiac surgery in central South Africa: feasibility and clinical value.Cardiovascular journal of AfricaObservational
- The paucity of high-level evidence for therapy in pediatric cardiology.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
- Pediatric cardiology: In search for evidence.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewBecause of the relatively small numbers of pediatric patients with congenital heart disease cared for in any individual center, there is a significant need for multicenter clinical studies to validate new medical or surgical therapies. The Pediatric Heart Network (PHN), with 15 years of experience in multicenter clinical research, has tackled numerous challenges when conducting multicenter studies. RECENT
findingsThis review describes the challenges encountered and the strategies employed to conduct high-quality, collaborative research in pediatric cardiovascular disease. SUMMARY: Sharing lessons learned from the PHN can provide guidance to investigators interested in conducting pediatric multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.