Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26196135›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Superiority of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Reducing In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Can Zhou, Li Zhang, Hua Wang, Xiaoxia Ma, Bohui Shi, Wuke Chen, Jianjun He, Ke Wang, Peijun Liu, Yu Ren

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03713749 (Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03713749 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy(REVATE) : a Multicenter Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChang Gung Memorial HospitalRan2018 to 2022Enrolled212ConditionsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaArmsRobot esophagectomy (RE)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A Case of Esophageal Cancer Treated by Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy after Bilateral Cadaveric Lung Transplantation.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Minimally invasive esophagectomy.Current problems in surgery · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Precautions for avoiding pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Can ZhouDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shan'xi Province, China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shan'xi Province, China.
Hua WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shan'xi Province, China.
Xiaoxia MaDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shan'xi Province, China.
Bohui ShiDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shan'xi Province, China.
Wuke ChenDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shan'xi Province, China.
Jianjun HeDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shan'xi Province, China.
Ke WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shan'xi Province, China.
Peijun LiuDepartment of Translational Medicine Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yu RenDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shan'xi Province, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompared with open oesophagectomy (OE), minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) proves to have benefits in reducing the risk of pulmonary complications for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. However, it is unknown whether MIO has superiority in reducing the occurrence of in-hospital mortality (IHM).

objectiveThe objective of this meta-analysis was to explore the effect of MIO vs. OE on the occurrence of in-hospital mortality (IHM). DATA SOURCES: Sources such as Medline (through December 31, 2014), Embase (through December 31, 2014), Wiley Online Library (through December 31, 2014), and the Cochrane Library (through December 31, 2014) were searched. STUDY SELECTION: Data of randomized and non-randomized clinical trials related to MIO versus OE were included.

interventionsEligible studies were those that reported patients who underwent MIO procedure. The control group included patients undergoing conventional OE. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsFixed or random -effects models were used to calculate summary odds ratios (ORs) or relative risks (RRs) for quantification of associations. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated by using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics.

resultsA total of 48 studies involving 14,311 cases of resectable oesophageal cancer were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to patients undergoing OE, patients undergoing MIO had statistically reduced occurrence of IHM (OR=0.69, 95%CI =0.55 -0.86). Patients undergoing MIO also had significantly reduced incidence of pulmonary complications (PCs) (RR=0.73, 95%CI = 0.63-0.86), pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR=0.71, 95%CI= 0.51-0.99) and arrhythmia (OR=0.79, 95%CI = 0.68-0.92). Non-significant reductions were observed among the included studies in the occurrence of anastomotic leak (AL) (OR=0.93, 95%CI =0.78-1.11), or Gastric Tip Necrosis (GTN) (OR=0.89, 95%CI =0.54-1.49). LIMITATION: Most of the included studies were non-randomized case-control studies, with a diversity of study designs, demographics of participants and surgical intervention.

conclusionsMinimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) has superiority over open oesophagectomy (OE) in terms of the occurrence of in-hospital mortality (IHM) and should be the first-choice surgical procedure in esophageal surgery.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAnastomotic LeakArrhythmias, CardiacClinical Trials as TopicEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyEsophagusHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNecrosisOdds RatioRiskTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26196135
PMCPMC4509855
OpenAlexW2215111078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.