Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26195957›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology2015

Research Findings on Overactive Bladder.

Phani B Patra, Sayani Patra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Urothelial proliferation and regeneration after spinal cord injury.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2017
    Article
  11. CUA guideline on adult overactive bladder.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Impact of overactive bladder on retrograde ejaculation.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Phani B PatraKing of Prussia, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa., USA.
Sayani PatraDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa., USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several physiopathologic conditions lead to the manifestation of overactive bladder (OAB). These conditions include ageing, diabetes mellitus, bladder outlet obstruction, spinal cord injury, stroke and brain injury, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, interstitial cystitis, stress and depression. This review has discussed research findings in human and animal studies conducted on the above conditions. Several structural and functional changes under these conditions have not only been observed in the lower urinary tract, but also in the brain and spinal cord. Significant changes were observed in the following areas: neurotransmitters, prostaglandins, nerve growth factor, Rho-kinase, interstitial cells of Cajal, and ion and transient receptor potential channels. Interestingly, alterations in these areas showed great variation in each of the conditions of the OAB, suggesting that the pathophysiology of the OAB might be different in each condition of the disease. It is anticipated that this review will be helpful for further research on new and specific drug development against OAB.

Indexed as

AgeingBladder outlet obstructionBrain injuryDepressionDiabetes mellitusInterstitial cystitisMultiple sclerosisParkinson's diseaseSpinal cord injuryStressStroke

Identifiers

PMID26195957
PMCPMC4483299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.