ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015
Binary nanoparticle superlattices of soft-particle systems.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Pushing the Frontiers: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Guided Programmable Concepts in Binary Self-Assembly of Colloidal Nanoparticles.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Interspecies interactions in dual, fibrous gels enable control of gel structure and rheology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Ordered three-dimensional nanomaterials using DNA-prescribed and valence-controlled material voxels.Nature materials · 2020Article
- The Stability of a Nanoparticle Diamond Lattice Linked by DNA.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Article
- Generic phase diagram of binary superlattices.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
- Lattice engineering through nanoparticle-DNA frameworks.Nature materials · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The solid-phase diagram of binary systems consisting of particles of diameter σA = σ and σB = γσ (γ ≤ 1) interacting with an inverse p = 12 power law is investigated as a paradigm of a soft potential. In addition to the diameter ratio γ that characterizes hard-sphere models, the phase diagram is a function of an additional parameter that controls the relative interaction strength between the different particle types. Phase diagrams are determined from extremes of thermodynamic functions by considering 15 candidate lattices. In general, it is shown that the phase diagram of a soft repulsive potential leads to the morphological diversity observed in experiments with binary nanoparticles, thus providing a general framework to understand their phase diagrams. Particular emphasis is given to the two most successful crystallization strategies so far: evaporation of solvent from nanoparticles with grafted hydrocarbon ligands and DNA programmable self-assembly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.