Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26195774›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Clonal reproduction in fungi.

John W Taylor, Christopher Hann-Soden, Sara Branco, Iman Sylvain, Christopher E Ellison

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Tracing the evolution and genomic dynamics of mating-type loci inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Alternaria diseases on potato and tomato.Molecular plant pathology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Biogeography of Fungal Communities Associated withJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Population genomics reveals meiotic recombination inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Hiding in plain sight: Genome-wide recombination and a dynamic accessory genome drive diversity inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Enforcement of Postzygotic Species Boundaries in the Fungal Kingdom.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John W TaylorDepartments of Plant and Microbial Biology and jtaylor@berkeley.edu.
Christopher Hann-SodenDepartments of Plant and Microbial Biology and.
Sara BrancoDepartments of Plant and Microbial Biology and.
Iman SylvainDepartments of Plant and Microbial Biology and.
Christopher E EllisonIntegrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Integra (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research over the past two decades shows that both recombination and clonality are likely to contribute to the reproduction of all fungi. This view of fungi is different from the historical and still commonly held view that a large fraction of fungi are exclusively clonal and that some fungi have been exclusively clonal for hundreds of millions of years. Here, we first will consider how these two historical views have changed. Then we will examine the impact on fungal research of the concept of restrained recombination [Tibayrenc M, Ayala FJ (2012) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109 (48):E3305-E3313]. Using animal and human pathogenic fungi, we examine extrinsic restraints on recombination associated with bottlenecks in genetic variation caused by geographic dispersal and extrinsic restraints caused by shifts in reproductive mode associated with either disease transmission or hybridization. Using species of the model yeast Saccharomyces and the model filamentous fungus Neurospora, we examine intrinsic restraints on recombination associated with mating systems that range from strictly clonal at one extreme to fully outbreeding at the other and those that lie between, including selfing and inbreeding. We also consider the effect of nomenclature on perception of reproductive mode and a means of comparing the relative impact of clonality and recombination on fungal populations. Last, we consider a recent hypothesis suggesting that fungi thought to have the most severe intrinsic constraints on recombination actually may have the fewest.

Indexed as

AnimalsClone CellsFungiGenetics, PopulationGenotypeHumansMycorrhizaeRecombination, GeneticReproductionclonalityfungipopulation genomicsrecombinationreproduction

Identifiers

PMID26195774
PMCPMC4517272
OpenAlexW1631376597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.