ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015
Toward an evolutionary model of cancer: Considering the mechanisms that govern the fate of somatic mutations.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fisher Information Limits on Genetic Stability, Diversity, and Regulation.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
- What sets the mutation rate of a cell type in an animal species?PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Of Barriers and Loops-How Evolution Limits Most Cancer Risks to Older Ages.Cancer discovery · 2026Review
- A hybrid Ornstein-Uhlenbeck-Branching framework unifies microbial and pediatric tumor evolution.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- What sets the mutation rate of a cell type in an animal species?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Selection Estimation from Genetic Time-Series Data: Effects of Limited Sampling and Genetic Drift.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- The adaptive state determines the impact of mutations on evolving populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Inflammation Promotes Aging-Associated Oncogenesis in the Lung.Aging and cancer · 2025Article
- When Do Tumours Develop? Neoplastic Processes Across Different Timescales: Age, Season and Round the Circadian Clock.Evolutionary applications · 2024Review
- Review
- Preneoplastic cells switch to Warburg metabolism from their inception exposing multiple vulnerabilities for targeted elimination.Oncogenesis · 2024Article
- Review
- Causes and consequences of clonal hematopoiesis.Blood · 2023Review
- A Poisson distribution-based general model of cancer rates and a cancer risk-dependent theory of aging.Aging · 2023Article
- Skin aging from the perspective of dermal fibroblasts: the interplay between the adaptation to the extracellular matrix microenvironment and cell autonomous processes.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023Review
- Article
- Network location and clustering of genetic mutations determine chronicity in a stylized model of genetic diseases.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Increased risk of cancer in dogs and humans: a consequence of recent extension of lifespan beyond evolutionarily-determined limitations?Aging and cancer · 2022Article
- Revelations About Aging and Disease from Unconventional Vertebrate Model Organisms.Annual review of genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Our understanding of cancer has greatly advanced since Nordling [Nordling CO (1953) Br J Cancer 7(1):68-72] and Armitage and Doll [Armitage P, Doll R (1954) Br J Cancer 8(1):1-12] put forth the multistage model of carcinogenesis. However, a number of observations remain poorly understood from the standpoint of this paradigm in its contemporary state. These observations include the similar age-dependent exponential rise in incidence of cancers originating from stem/progenitor pools differing drastically in size, age-dependent cell division profiles, and compartmentalization. This common incidence pattern is characteristic of cancers requiring different numbers of oncogenic mutations, and it scales to very divergent life spans of mammalian species. Also, bigger mammals with larger underlying stem cell pools are not proportionally more prone to cancer, an observation known as Peto's paradox. Here, we present a number of factors beyond the occurrence of oncogenic mutations that are unaccounted for in the current model of cancer development but should have significant impacts on cancer incidence. Furthermore, we propose a revision of the current understanding for how oncogenic and other functional somatic mutations affect cellular fitness. We present evidence, substantiated by evolutionary theory, demonstrating that fitness is a dynamic environment-dependent property of a phenotype and that oncogenic mutations should have vastly different fitness effects on somatic cells dependent on the tissue microenvironment in an age-dependent manner. Combined, this evidence provides a firm basis for understanding the age-dependent incidence of cancers as driven by age-altered systemic processes regulated above the cell level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.