Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26195680›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Exploring the Patient and Staff Experience With the Process of Primary Care.

Elizabeth J Brown, Shreya Kangovi, Christopher Sha, Sarah Johnson, Casey Chanton, Tamala Carter, David T Grande

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth J BrownThe Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania The Department of Family and Community Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania elizbro@upenn.edu.
Shreya KangoviThe Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania The Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Penn Center for Community Health Workers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Christopher ShaDepartment of Medicine, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Sarah JohnsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
Casey ChantonPenn Center for Community Health Workers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Tamala CarterPenn Center for Community Health Workers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
David T GrandeThe Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania The Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Penn Center for AIDS Research · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · USUniversity of San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious studies suggest that the highest-risk patients value accessible, coordinated primary care that they perceive to be of high technical quality. We have limited understanding, however, of how low-income, chronically ill patients and the staff who care for them experience each individual step in the primary care process.

methodsWe conducted qualitative interviews with uninsured or Medicaid patients with chronic illnesses, as well as with primary care staff. We interviewed 21 patients and 30 staff members with a variety of job titles from 3 primary care practices (1 federally qualified health center and 2 academically affiliated clinics).]

resultsThe interviews revealed 3 major issues that were present at all stages of a primary care episode: (1) information flow throughout an episode of care is a frequent challenge, despite systems that are intended to improve communication; (2) misaligned goals and expectations among patients, clinicians, and staff members are often an impediment to providing and obtaining care; and (3) personal relationships are highly valued by both patients and staff.

conclusionsVulnerable populations and the primary care staff who work with them perceive some of the same challenges throughout the primary care process. Improving information flow, aligning goals and expectations, and developing personal relationships may improve the experience of both patients and staff.

Indexed as

Vulnerable PopulationsAdultCommunicationFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMedicaidMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedOffice VisitsPatient-Centered CareProfessional-Patient RelationsUnited Stateschronic illnessmedical staffoffice visitspatient-centered medical homepatientspractice-based researchprimary careprocess of carequalitative researchvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID26195680
PMCPMC4508176
OpenAlexW2283253868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.