Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26195627›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2015

Analysis of Conserved Glutamate and Aspartate Residues in Drosophila Rhodopsin 1 and Their Influence on Spectral Tuning.

Lijun Zheng, David M Farrell, Ruth M Fulton, Eve E Bagg, Ernesto Salcedo, Meridee Manino, Steven G Britt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of Reversible Phosphorylation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lijun ZhengFrom the Departments of Cell and Developmental Biology.
David M FarrellPharmacology, and.
Ruth M FultonFrom the Departments of Cell and Developmental Biology.
Eve E BaggFrom the Departments of Cell and Developmental Biology.
Ernesto SalcedoFrom the Departments of Cell and Developmental Biology.
Meridee ManinoFrom the Departments of Cell and Developmental Biology.
Steven G BrittFrom the Departments of Cell and Developmental Biology, Ophthalmology and Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045 steve.britt@ucdenver.edu.

Funding

MOLECULAR GENETICS OF RHODOPSIN SENSITIVITYR01EY010759 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI BRITT, STEVEN G · 1995 to 2002
$815k
NEI NIH HHS R01-EY10759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms that regulate invertebrate visual pigment absorption are poorly understood. Studies of amphioxus Go-opsin have demonstrated that Glu-181 functions as the counterion in this pigment. This finding has led to the proposal that Glu-181 may function as the counterion in other invertebrate visual pigments as well. Here we describe a series of mutagenesis experiments to test this hypothesis and to also test whether other conserved acidic amino acids in Drosophila Rhodopsin 1 (Rh1) may serve as the counterion of this visual pigment. Of the 5 Glu and Asp residues replaced by Gln or Asn in our experiments, none of the mutant pigments shift the absorption of Rh1 by more than 6 nm. In combination with prior studies, these results suggest that the counterion in Drosophila Rh1 may not be located at Glu-181 as in amphioxus, or at Glu-113 as in bovine rhodopsin. Conversely, the extremely low steady state levels of the E194Q mutant pigment (bovine opsin site Glu-181), and the rhabdomere degeneration observed in flies expressing this mutant demonstrate that a negatively charged residue at this position is essential for normal rhodopsin function in vivo. This work also raises the possibility that another residue or physiologic anion may compensate for the missing counterion in the E194Q mutant.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsAspartic AcidBlotting, WesternConserved SequenceDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGlutamic AcidMicrospectrophotometryOpsinsPhylogenyProtein Structure, SecondaryRetinal DegenerationRhodopsinAspartic AcidDrosophila ProteinsGlutamic AcidOpsinsRhodopsincolor perceptionDrosophilaphotoreceptorretinarhodopsinsite-directed mutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID26195627
PMCPMC4571949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.