ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2015
Ethylphenidate: availability, patterns of use, and acute effects of this novel psychoactive substance.
Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Designer drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effects.Archives of toxicology · 2020Review
- Repeated Use of the Psychoactive Substance Ethylphenidate Impacts Neurochemistry and Reward Learning in Adolescent Male and Female Mice.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Baclofen in gamma-hydroxybutyrate withdrawal: patterns of use and online availability.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Review
- Article
- Intoxication caused by new psychostimulants: analytical methods to disclose acute and chronic use of benzofurans and ethylphenidate.International journal of legal medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEthylphenidate is a novel psychoactive substance that is an analogue of methylphenidate. This paper describes its availability, patterns of use, and acute effects.
methodsSearches of the scientific and grey literature (publicly accessible Internet resources) were undertaken, using the keywords "Ethylphenidate", "Ethyl phenidate", "Ethyl phenyl(piperidin-2-yl)acetate", and "Nopaine", to identify information on the prevalence and patterns of use, desired effects, and toxicity of ethylphenidate. An Internet snapshot survey was performed on 10 February 2015 to provide information on availability and cost of ethylphenidate.
resultsThe literature search identified 1 case series of acute recreational ethylphenidate toxicity, 1 case report of ethylphenidate dependence, 1 qualitative analysis of user reports on Internet drug forums, 2 conference abstracts for surveillance studies, 1 report of two cases of ethylphenidate detected in post-mortem analyses, and 198 user reports on Internet discussion forums and social media sites. The Internet snapshot survey found 83 websites selling ethylphenidate, with purchase prices ranging from £28.20 ± 0.63 (€37.71 ± 0.85) per gram for a 500-mg amount to £2.64 ± 0.57 (€3.53 ± 0.77) per gram for 1 kg. The published cases and Internet user reports suggest the acute effects of ethylphenidate are similar to other stimulant drugs; the most common route of use was by nasal insufflation. The most common desired effects were euphoria, stimulation, and increased concentration, sociability, and energy levels; the most common unwanted effects included anxiety, palpitations, insomnia, and paranoia.
conclusionThis review of the scientific and grey literature has demonstrated that the acute harms associated with its use are stimulant in nature and that ethylphenidate is widely available to users over the Internet, with significant discounts for bulk purchases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.