Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26194850›Full record

Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2016

Nutrient supplementation may adversely affect maternal oral health--a randomised controlled trial in rural Malawi.

Ulla Harjunmaa, Jorma Järnstedt, Kathryn G Dewey, Ulla Ashorn, Kenneth Maleta, Stephen A Vosti, Per Ashorn

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ulla HarjunmaaDepartment of International Health, University of Tampere School of Medicine, Tampere, Finland.
Jorma JärnstedtDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Kathryn G DeweyDepartment of Nutrition, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Ulla AshornDepartment of International Health, University of Tampere School of Medicine, Tampere, Finland.
Kenneth MaletaDepartment of Community Health, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Stephen A VostiDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Per AshornDepartment of International Health, University of Tampere School of Medicine, Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FITampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Malawi · MW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutritional supplementation during pregnancy is increasingly recommended especially in low-resource settings, but its oral health impacts have not been studied. Our aim was to examine whether supplementation with multiple micronutrients (MMN) or small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements affects dental caries development or periodontal health in a rural Malawian population. The study was embedded in a controlled iLiNS-DYAD trial that enrolled 1391 pregnant women <20 gestation weeks. Women were provided with one daily iron-folic acid capsule (IFA), one capsule with 18 micronutrients (MMN) or one sachet of lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS) containing protein, carbohydrates, essential fatty acids and 21 micronutrients. Oral examination of 1024 participants was conducted and panoramic X-ray taken within 6 weeks after delivery. The supplement groups were similar at baseline in average socio-economic, nutritional and health status. At the end of the intervention, the prevalence of caries was 56.7%, 69.1% and 63.3% (P = 0.004), and periodontitis 34.9%, 29.8% and 31.2% (P = 0.338) in the IFA, MMN and LNS groups, respectively. Compared with the IFA group, women in the MMN group had 0.60 (0.18-1.02) and in the LNS group 0.59 (0.17-1.01) higher mean number of caries lesions. In the absence of baseline oral health data, firm conclusions on causality cannot be drawn. However, although not confirmatory, the findings are consistent with a possibility that provision of MMN or LNS may have increased the caries incidence in this target population. Because of the potential public health impacts, further research on the association between gestational nutrient interventions and oral health in low-income settings is needed.

Indexed as

Maternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaRural HealthDental CariesDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansIncidenceIntention to Treat AnalysisLost to Follow-UpMalawiMicronutrientsOutpatient Clinics, HospitalPeriodontitisPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsMicronutrientsdental cariesmicronutrientnutritional interventionoral healthperiodontal diseasespregnancy

Identifiers

PMID26194850
PMCPMC6860085
OpenAlexW2130703972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.