Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26194759›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

Trade-offs in antibody repertoires to complex antigens.

Lauren M Childs, Edward B Baskerville, Sarah Cobey

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Variable progressive behavior ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Optimizing immunization protocols to elicit broadly neutralizing antibodies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Tuning environmental timescales to evolve and maintain generalists.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren M ChildsCenter for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA lchilds@hsph.harvard.edu.
Edward B BaskervilleEcology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sarah CobeyEcology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · USCenter for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy · US

Funding

Modeling the Evolutionary Dynamics of Immunity to Influenza for Vaccine DevelopmeDP2AI117921 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI COBEY, SARAH · 2014 to 2014
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS DP2 AI117921NIAID NIH HHS DP2AI117921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogens vary in their antigenic complexity. While some pathogens such as measles present a few relatively invariant targets to the immune system, others such as malaria display considerable antigenic diversity. How the immune response copes in the presence of multiple antigens, and whether a trade-off exists between the breadth and efficacy of antibody (Ab)-mediated immune responses, are unsolved problems. We present a theoretical model of affinity maturation of B-cell receptors (BCRs) during a primary infection and examine how variation in the number of accessible antigenic sites alters the Ab repertoire. Naive B cells with randomly generated receptor sequences initiate the germinal centre (GC) reaction. The binding affinity of a BCR to an antigen is quantified via a genotype-phenotype map, based on a random energy landscape, that combines local and distant interactions between residues. In the presence of numerous antigens or epitopes, B-cell clones with different specificities compete for stimulation during rounds of mutation within GCs. We find that the availability of many epitopes reduces the affinity and relative breadth of the Ab repertoire. Despite the stochasticity of somatic hypermutation, patterns of immunodominance are strongly shaped by chance selection of naive B cells with specificities for particular epitopes. Our model provides a mechanistic basis for the diversity of Ab repertoires and the evolutionary advantage of antigenically complex pathogens.

Indexed as

Antibody DiversityAntigenic VariationAnimalsAntibody AffinityB-LymphocytesClonal Selection, Antigen-MediatedComputer SimulationEvolution, MolecularGene Rearrangement, B-LymphocyteGerminal CenterHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmunodominant EpitopesImmunologic MemoryModels, GeneticModels, ImmunologicalImmunodominant EpitopesReceptors, Antigen, B-Cellaffinity maturationantibody repertoire evolutiongerminal centre reactionNK model

Identifiers

PMID26194759
PMCPMC4528422
OpenAlexW1954069242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.