Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26194753›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

The analysis of clonal expansions in normal and autoimmune B cell repertoires.

Uri Hershberg, Eline T Luning Prak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. AI-Driven BCR Modeling for Precision Immunology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Explore antibody repertoire in the era of AI.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Evaluating methods for B-cell clonal family assignment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Uri HershbergSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Bossone 7-711, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA Department of Immunology and Microbiology, College of Medicine, Drexel University, Bossone 7-711, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Eline T Luning PrakDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 405B Stellar Chance Labs, 422 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA luning@mail.med.upenn.edu.

Funding

Transcriptomics and Repertoire ProfilingP01AI106697 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Donna L. Farber · 2013 to 2026
$31.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI106697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clones are the fundamental building blocks of immune repertoires. The number of different clones relates to the diversity of the repertoire, whereas their size and sequence diversity are linked to selective pressures. Selective pressures act both between clones and within different sequence variants of a clone. Understanding how clonal selection shapes the immune repertoire is one of the most basic questions in all of immunology. But how are individual clones defined? Here we discuss different approaches for defining clones, starting with how antibodies are diversified during different stages of B cell development. Next, we discuss how clones are defined using different experimental methods. We focus on high-throughput sequencing datasets, and the computational challenges and opportunities that these data have for mining the antibody repertoire landscape. We discuss methods that visualize sequence variants within the same clone and allow us to consider collections of shared mutations to determine which sequences share a common ancestry. Finally, we comment on features of frequently encountered expanded B cell clones that may be of particular interest in the setting of autoimmunity and other chronic conditions.

Indexed as

AutoimmunityB-LymphocytesCell DifferentiationCell Surface Display TechniquesClonal Selection, Antigen-MediatedHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansHybridomasImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulin Light ChainsSingle-Cell AnalysisSomatic Hypermutation, ImmunoglobulinImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulin Light Chainsantibodycloneclonotypehigh-throughput sequencingimmunoglobulinrepertoire

Identifiers

PMID26194753
PMCPMC4528416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.