Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26194694›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2015

In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Helcococcus kunzii and molecular analysis of macrolide and tetracycline resistance.

A Vergne, F Guérin, R Lienhard, A Le Coustumier, C Daurel, C Isnard, N Marty, C Poyart, V Cattoir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. BMJ case reports · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

A VergneLaboratoire de Biologie, CH de Cahors, Cahors, France.
F GuérinService de Microbiologie & CNR de la Résistance aux Antibiotiques, CHU de Caen, Caen, France.
R LienhardADMED Microbiologie, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland.
A Le CoustumierLaboratoire de Biologie, CH de Cahors, Cahors, France.
C DaurelService de Microbiologie & CNR de la Résistance aux Antibiotiques, CHU de Caen, Caen, France.
C IsnardService de Microbiologie & CNR de la Résistance aux Antibiotiques, CHU de Caen, Caen, France.
N MartyService de Bactériologie-Hygiène, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
C PoyartService de Bactériologie & CNR des Streptocoques, GH Cochin-Hôtel Dieu-Broca, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
V CattoirService de Microbiologie & CNR de la Résistance aux Antibiotiques, CHU de Caen, Caen, France. cattoir-v@chu-caen.fr.
Groupe Cahors (France) · FRADMED (Switzerland) · CHAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRCNR de la Résistance aux Antibiotiques · FRUniversité de Caen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thanks to the recent advent of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) technology, Helcococcus kunzii is now easily identifiable and considered as an opportunistic pathogen. However, data about antimicrobial susceptibilities remain very limited. The aim of the study was, then, to assess its in vitro susceptibility to 18 antimicrobial agents and to investigate the genetic basis of macrolide and tetracycline resistance. Thirty-nine human clinical isolates of H. kunzii collected from 2008 to 2013 were studied, as well as the type strain ATCC 51366(T). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of penicillin G, amoxicillin, cefotaxime, imipenem, gentamicin, erythromycin, clindamycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, tetracycline, tigecycline, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, daptomycin, cotrimoxazole and rifampin were determined by the microdilution method. Screening for macrolide [erm(A) including erm(TR), erm(B), erm(C), erm(F), erm(T), erm(X), msr(A) and mef(A)] and tetracycline [tet(L), tet(M) and tet(O)] resistance genes was performed, as well as the detection of mutations in 23S rRNA. Except for one strain resistant to cefotaxime, all strains were categorised as susceptible to β-lactams, glycopeptides, linezolid, daptomycin and tigecycline. Whereas ciprofloxacin and gentamicin exhibited limited activity, 95% of strains were categorised as susceptible to levofloxacin. Concerning erythromycin, a bimodal distribution was observed, with 29 'wild-type' strains (MICs from 0.25 to 2 mg/L) and 11 'resistant' strains (MICs ≥ 256 mg/L), including ten harbouring erm(TR). Two isolates exhibited acquired tetracycline resistance (MICs of 16 mg/L) by the production of tet(M). This large study on the in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of H. kunzii suggests that β-lactams (especially penicillins) should be preferred for the treatment.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacillotaDrug Resistance, BacterialFranceHumansMacrolidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSwitzerlandTetracycline ResistanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsMacrolides

Identifiers

PMID26194694
OpenAlexW936929458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.