ReviewDer Anaesthesist2015
[Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Case series of prehospital and in-hospital therapies].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults and children: A review of literature, published guidelines and pediatric single-center program building experience.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Distal Perfusion Cannulation and Limb Complications in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2018Article
- [Current recommendations for basic/advanced life support : Addressing unanswered questions and future prospects].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2016Article
- [Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation : Principles and medical indications].Der Internist · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite new concepts and strategies of basic and advanced life support, the outcome of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains poor. The main reason accounting for these poor results is a low-flow phase during conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with insufficient end organ perfusion. The early use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vaECMO) during CPR, i.e. extracorporeal resuscitation (ECPR) might improve OHCA survival rates as well as the neurological outcome in resuscitated patients. This article on a case series discusses the management of ECPR in three patients with OHCA. All patients suffered from a witnessed OHCA and received effective bystander CPR. After subsequent advanced cardiac life support could not achieve a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), vaECMO support was established as a bridge to therapy on site or after transportation to a primary or tertiary hospital. During the course of therapy two patients died and one patient was discharged after a full recovery. Early ECPR might improve the outcome in patients with prolonged cardiac arrest without ROSC. The use of ECPR should be based on the individual decision of an experienced ECPR team considering defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. As the outcome mainly depends on the duration and quality of conventional CPR, ECPR support should be requested immediately after establishing advanced life support (approximately 10-15 min).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.