Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26194533›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2015

The use of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein test as a promising tool for intracerebral hemorrhage diagnosis in Chinese patients and prediction of the short-term functional outcomes.

Lijun Xiong, Yan Yang, Mei Zhang, Wuping Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Acute Stroke Biomarkers: Are We There Yet?Frontiers in neurology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Advances in clinical neurology through the journal "Neurological Sciences" (2015-2016).Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lijun XiongDepartment of Neurology, Wuhan Central Hospital, 26 Shengli Road, Wuhan City, 430014, People's Republic of China.
Yan YangDepartment of Neurology, Wuhan Central Hospital, 26 Shengli Road, Wuhan City, 430014, People's Republic of China.
Mei ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Wuhan Central Hospital, 26 Shengli Road, Wuhan City, 430014, People's Republic of China.
Wuping XuDepartment of Neurology, Wuhan Central Hospital, 26 Shengli Road, Wuhan City, 430014, People's Republic of China. xwp881019@sina.com.
Central Hospital of Wuhan · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore the efficacy of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) from ischemic stroke (IS). Suspicious patients of acute stroke were screened and finally diagnosed by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Blood samples were collected within 2-6 h after onset of symptoms, and serum GFAP level was determined by ELISA assay. The functional outcome for the patients was determined by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 90 days after onset of symptoms. 43 ICH patients and 65 IS patients were enrolled. GFAP concentration in ICH group was significantly higher than in IS group (p < 0.001). Significant correlation was found when comparing GFAP with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (r = 0.418, p = 0.005) and hemorrhage volume (r = 0.840, p < 0.001) in ICH group, while such correlation was not observed in IS group. ROC analysis indicated that GFAP level at the cut-point of 0.7 ng/ml yielded an AUC of 0.901 (95 % CI 0.828-0.950) with high sensitivity (86.0 %) and specificity (76.9 %) to differentiate ICH from IS. Patients with higher serum GFAP concentration in ICH group experienced poorer functional disability (r = 0.755, p < 0.001), while this phenomenon was not observed in IS group (r = -0.114, p = 0.368). ROC curve analysis found that GFAP level at the cut-point of 1.04 ng/ml yielded an AUC of 0.936 (95 % CI 0.817-0.988) in identifying patients with poor functional outcome, at the sensitivity and specificity of 95.7 and 80.0 %, respectively. GFAP test is a promising technique for diagnosis of ICH from IS and prediction of short-term functional outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedArea Under CurveAsian PeopleBiomarkersBrain IschemiaCerebral HemorrhageChinaDiagnosis, DifferentialDisability EvaluationEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHumansMalePrognosisRecovery of FunctionBiomarkersGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinAcute strokeBiomarkerGlial fibrillary acidic proteinIntracerebral hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID26194533
OpenAlexW981722277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.