ArticleScientific reports2015
Streptococcal IdeS: therapeutic potential for Guillain-Barré syndrome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute Management of Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Therapeutic IgG- and IgM-specific proteases disarm the acetylcholine receptor autoantibodies that drive myasthenia gravis pathology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The deLIVERed promises of gene therapy: Past, present, and future of liver-directed gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- Guillain-Barré syndrome: a comprehensive review.European journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Progress in Guillain-Barré syndrome immunotherapy-A narrative review of new strategies in recent years.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Review
- Extensive substrate recognition by the streptococcal antibody-degrading enzymes IdeS and EndoS.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Novel Immunological and Therapeutic Insights in Guillain-Barré Syndrome and CIDP.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021Review
- Rescuing AAV gene transfer from neutralizing antibodies with an IgG-degrading enzyme.JCI insight · 2020Article
- BspK, a Serine Protease from the Predatory Bacterium Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus with Utility for Analysis of Therapeutic Antibodies.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2017Article
- Novel IgG-Degrading Enzymes of the IgdE Protease Family Link Substrate Specificity to Host Tropism of Streptococcus Species.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin are effective in treating Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) probably because the former removes IgG autoantibodies and complement and the latter inhibits complement activation subsequent to the autoantibody binding to peripheral nerve antigens. IgG degrading enzyme of Streptococcus pyogenes (IdeS) can cleave the pathogenic autoantibodies into F(ab')2 and Fc. The purpose of this study is to show whether IdeS has novel therapeutic potential for GBS. Sera with anti-ganglioside IgG antibodies from 15 patients with GBS or Miller Fisher syndrome were used. We tested whether IdeS cleaved the anti-ganglioside IgG antibodies and inhibited deposition of activated complement component on ELISA plates. IdeS efficiently cleaved IgG and blocked complement activation mediated by anti-GM1, anti-GD1a and anti-GQ1b IgG antibodies. IdeS has therapeutic potential for GBS and related conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.