ArticlePsycho-oncology2015
Effectiveness of the extended parallel process model in promoting colorectal cancer screening.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying Mediators of Intervention Effects Within a Randomized Controlled Trial to Motivate Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment Among Breast and Ovarian Cancer Survivors.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023Trial
- Recommending Breast Cancer Screening to My Mum: Examining the Interplay of Threat, Efficacy, and Virality on Recommendation Intention in the Chinese Context.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Trial
- Communicating risk to promote colorectal cancer screening: a multi-method study to test tailored versus targeted message strategies.Health education research · 2022Trial
- Do ultraviolet photos increase sun safe behavior expectations via fear? A randomized controlled trial in a sample of U.S. adults.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2019Trial
- Intervention Mediators in a Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Colonoscopy Uptake Among Individuals at Increased Risk of Familial Colorectal Cancer.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2017Trial
- Improving communication to increase uptake of high-risk breast cancer prevention appointments: Building a better letter.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Boil water notices as health-risk communication: risk perceptions, efficacy, and compliance during winter storm Uri.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Predicting college students' COVID-19 vaccination behavior: an application of the extended parallel process model.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2023Article
- When Cigarette Smoking Meets COVID-19: How the Two Types of Threat and Efficacy Perceptions Interactively Predict Danger Control and Fear Control Processes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Can virtual human clinicians help close the gap in colorectal cancer screening for rural adults in the United States? The influence of rural identity on perceptions of virtual human clinicians.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Risk Awareness and Impediments to Disaster Preparedness of Foreign Residents in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area, Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of a tailored communication intervention on colonoscopy uptake for firstdegree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2022Article
- Motivating cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolemia: applying the extended parallel process model for clinician communication.Translational behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- Using Facebook to promote the uptake of colorectal cancer screening.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- Telehealth and racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening: A pilot study of how virtual clinician characteristics influence screening intentions.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Extended parallel process model (EPPM) in evaluating lung Cancer risk perception among older smokers.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Perceived Threats toward Esophageal Cancer among Immediate Relatives of Sufferers: a Qualitative Study.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2021Article
- Internet-based Tailored Virtual Human Health Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening: Design Guidelines from Two User Studies.Intelligent virtual agents : ... International Workshop, IVA ... proceedings. IVA (Conference) · 2021Article
- Psychological predictors of intention and avoidance of attending organized mammography screening in Norway: applying the Extended Parallel Process Model.BMC women's health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRelatives of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are at increased risk for the disease, yet screening rates still remain low. Guided by the Extended Parallel Process Model, we examined the impact of a personalized, remote risk communication intervention on behavioral intention and colonoscopy uptake in relatives of CRC patients, assessing the original additive model and an alternative model in which each theoretical construct contributes uniquely.
methodsWe collected intention-to-screen and medical record-verified colonoscopy information on 218 individuals who received the personalized intervention.
resultsStructural equation modeling showed poor main model fit (root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.109; standardized root mean residual (SRMR) = 0.134; comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.797; Akaike information criterion (AIC) = 11,601; Bayesian information criterion (BIC) = 11,884). However, the alternative model (RMSEA = 0.070; SRMR = 0.105; CFI = 0.918; AIC = 11,186; BIC = 11,498) showed good fit. Cancer susceptibility (B = 0.319, p < 0.001) and colonoscopy self-efficacy (B = 0.364, p < 0.001) perceptions predicted intention to screen, which was significantly associated with colonoscopy uptake (B = 0.539, p < 0.001).
conclusionsOur findings provide support of the utility of Extended Parallel Process Model for designing effective interventions to motivate CRC screening in persons at increased risk when individual elements of the model are considered. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.