Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26194118›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2016

Posterior reference guides do not always maintain the size of posterior femoral condyles in TKA.

Yukihide Minoda, Shigekazu Mizokawa, Yoichi Ohta, Mitsuhiko Ikebuchi, Maki Itokazu, Kazumasa Yamamura, Suguru Nakamura, Hiroaki Nakamura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yukihide MinodaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan. yminoda@msic.med.osaka-cu.ac.jp.
Shigekazu MizokawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Yoichi OhtaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Mitsuhiko IkebuchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Maki ItokazuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Kazumasa YamamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Suguru NakamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Hiroaki NakamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Osaka City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePosterior reference guides are provided by many manufacturers. However, the true posterior femoral condyle bone resection thicknesses using posterior reference guides are not stated by the manufacturers. The purpose of this study was to analyse the influence of the posterior reference guide designs on the posterior femoral condyle bone resection thickness.

methodsThickness of posterior femoral condyle bone resection and thickness of prostheses were investigated in 8 types of total knee prostheses using the production drawings provided by the manufacturers.

resultsPosterior femoral condyle bone resection thickness differed between prostheses. Change in size of the medial posterior condyle ranged from -0.5 to 1.4 mm at 0° external rotation, from -2.9 to 1.4 mm at 3° external rotation, and from -5.3 to 1.4 mm at 6° external rotation. Change in size of lateral posterior condyle ranged from -0.5 to 1.4 mm at 0° external rotation, from -0.4 to 3.4 mm at 3° external rotation, and from -0.4 to 5.3 mm at 6° external rotation.

conclusionsThis study showed that posterior femoral condyle bone resection thickness was different for each posterior reference guide. The rotation centre of posterior reference guides influenced the bone resection thickness in the posterior femoral condyle. The size of the posterior femoral condyles increased in some guides but decreased in other guides. The maximum differences in size changes of the posterior femoral condyles between the guides were 1.9 mm at 0° external rotation, 4.1 mm at 3° external rotation, and 6.3 mm at 6° external rotation. To control the size of posterior femoral condyles, the posterior reference guide design should be checked before use.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeAgedBone and BonesFemaleFemurHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedRotationPosterior femoral condylePosterior reference guideRotation of femoral componentTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID26194118
OpenAlexW977977200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.