Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26193360›Full record

ReviewAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2015

Machine-Assisted Organic Synthesis.

Steven V Ley, Daniel E Fitzpatrick, Rebecca M Myers, Claudio Battilocchio, Richard J Ingham

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advanced Electroanalysis for Electrosynthesis.ACS organic & inorganic Au · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Continuous Flow Synthesis of Anticancer Drugs.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Steven V LeyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW (UK). svl1000@cam.ac.uk.
Daniel E FitzpatrickDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW (UK).
Rebecca M MyersDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW (UK).
Claudio BattilocchioDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW (UK).
Richard J InghamDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW (UK).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this Review we describe how the advent of machines is impacting on organic synthesis programs, with particular emphasis on the practical issues associated with the design of chemical reactors. In the rapidly changing, multivariant environment of the research laboratory, equipment needs to be modular to accommodate high and low temperatures and pressures, enzymes, multiphase systems, slurries, gases, and organometallic compounds. Additional technologies have been developed to facilitate more specialized reaction techniques such as electrochemical and photochemical methods. All of these areas create both opportunities and challenges during adoption as enabling technologies.

Indexed as

Chemistry Techniques, SyntheticBiotechnologyHumansMacromolecular SubstancesMacromolecular Substancesmachine-assisted synthesissustainable chemistrysynthetic methods

Identifiers

PMID26193360
PMCPMC4834626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.