Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26193318›Full record

ReviewToxins2015

Cabinet of Curiosities: Venom Systems and Their Ecological Function in Mammals, with a Focus on Primates.

Johanna E Rode-Margono, K Anne-Isola Nekaris

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Armed stem to stinger: a review of the ecological roles of scorpion weapons.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2021
    Review
  12. Hello, kitty: could cat allergy be a form of intoxication?The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Solenodon genome reveals convergent evolution of venom in eulipotyphlan mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johanna E Rode-MargonoNocturnal Primate Research Group, Oxford Brookes University, Headington, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK. eva.rode-2011@brookes.ac.uk.
K Anne-Isola NekarisNocturnal Primate Research Group, Oxford Brookes University, Headington, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK. anekaris@brookes.ac.uk.
Oxford Brookes University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venom delivery systems (VDS) are common in the animal kingdom, but rare amongst mammals. New definitions of venom allow us to reconsider its diversity amongst mammals by reviewing the VDS of Chiroptera, Eulipotyphla, Monotremata, and Primates. All orders use modified anterior dentition as the venom delivery apparatus, except Monotremata, which possesses a crural system. The venom gland in most taxa is a modified submaxillary salivary gland. In Primates, the saliva is activated when combined with brachial gland exudate. In Monotremata, the crural spur contains the venom duct. Venom functions include feeding, intraspecific competition, anti-predator defense and parasite defense. Including mammals in discussion of venom evolution could prove vital in our understanding protein functioning in mammals and provide a new avenue for biomedical and therapeutic applications and drug discovery.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSalivary GlandsToothAnimalsPrimatesVenomsVenomsChiropteraEulipotyphlaevolutionMonotremataNycticebusprimatesvenom delivery system

Identifiers

PMID26193318
PMCPMC4516934
OpenAlexW2132175014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.