Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26193168›Full record

ArticleAccountability in research2016

The Ethical Challenges of Socially Responsible Science.

David B Resnik, Kevin C Elliott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accountability in research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. So what? Elevating the impact of implementation science.Implementation science communications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Biomedical research as collateral damage in a new world Order?International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Socially responsible science: Exploring the complexities.European journal for philosophy of science · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Culture of Biosafety, Biosecurity, and Responsible Conduct in the Life Sciences: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David B Resnika National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park , North Carolina , USA.
Kevin C Elliottb Lyman Briggs College, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, and Department of Philosophy , Michigan State University , East Lansing , Michigan , USA.

Funding

Ethical, social, and legal issues in environmental health researchZIAES102646 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RESNIK, DAVID · 2009 to 2025
$1.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 ES999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES102646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social responsibility is an essential part of the responsible conduct of research that presents difficult ethical questions for scientists. Recognizing one's social responsibilities as a scientist is an important first step toward exercising social responsibility, but it is only the beginning, since scientists may confront difficult value questions when deciding how to act responsibly. Ethical dilemmas related to socially responsible science fall into at least three basic categories: 1) dilemmas related to problem selection, 2) dilemmas related to publication and data sharing, and 3) dilemmas related to engaging society. In responding to these dilemmas, scientists must decide how to balance their social responsibilities against other professional commitments and how to avoid compromising their objectivity. In this article, we will examine the philosophical and ethical basis of social responsibility in science, discuss some of the ethical dilemmas related to exercising social responsibility, and make five recommendations to help scientists deal with these issues.

Indexed as

Ethics, ProfessionalEthics, ResearchSocial ResponsibilityHumansMoralsPoliticsScienceEthicsobjectivitypoliticsscientific researchsocial responsibilityvalues

Identifiers

PMID26193168
PMCPMC4631672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.