Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26193167›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2015

Traumatic spinal cord injury in mice with human immune systems.

Randall S Carpenter, Kristina A Kigerl, Jessica M Marbourg, Andrew D Gaudet, Devra Huey, Stefan Niewiesk, Phillip G Popovich

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bridging the gap: a translational perspective in spinal cord injury.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. IVIg attenuates complement and improves spinal cord injury outcomes in mice.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Randall S CarpenterNeuroscience Graduate Studies Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Repair, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kristina A KigerlCenter for Brain and Spinal Cord Repair, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jessica M MarbourgNeuroscience Graduate Studies Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Repair, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Andrew D GaudetCenter for Brain and Spinal Cord Repair, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Devra HueyDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Stefan NiewieskDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Phillip G PopovichNeuroscience Graduate Studies Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Center for Brain and Spinal Cord Repair, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: phillip.popovich@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Role of Inflammation in Tax-mediated TumorigenesisP01CA100730 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Malachi Griffith · 2003 to 2026
$44.8M
Ohio State Neuroscience Centr CoreP30NS045758 · NINDS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI OBRIETAN, KARL H · 2004 to 2015
$7.7M
Preventing autonomic dysreflexia to restore immune function after SCIR01NS083942 · NINDS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI POPOVICH, PHILLIP G · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
TREM2 regulation of macrophages in spinal cord injury and CNS endogenous repairR01NS072304 · NINDS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI POPOVICH, PHILLIP G · 2011 to 2013
$904k
NCI NIH HHS NCI P01CA100730NCI NIH HHS P01 CA100730NINDS NIH HHS NIH R01NS072304NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS045758NINDS NIH HHS P30NS045758NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072304NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse models have provided key insight into the cellular and molecular control of human immune system function. However, recent data indicate that extrapolating the functional capabilities of the murine immune system into humans can be misleading. Since immune cells significantly affect neuron survival and axon growth and also are required to defend the body against infection, it is important to determine the pathophysiological significance of spinal cord injury (SCI)-induced changes in human immune system function. Research projects using monkeys or humans would be ideal; however, logistical and ethical barriers preclude detailed mechanistic studies in either species. Humanized mice, i.e., immunocompromised mice reconstituted with human immune cells, can help overcome these barriers and can be applied in various experimental conditions that are of interest to the SCI community. Specifically, newborn NOD-SCID-IL2rg(null) (NSG) mice engrafted with human CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells develop normally without neurological impairment. In this report, new data show that when mice with human immune systems receive a clinically-relevant spinal contusion injury, spontaneous functional recovery is indistinguishable from that achieved after SCI using conventional inbred mouse strains. Moreover, using routine immunohistochemical and flow cytometry techniques, one can easily phenotype circulating human immune cells and document the composition and distribution of these cells in the injured spinal cord. Lesion pathology in humanized mice is typical of mouse contusion injuries, producing a centralized lesion epicenter that becomes occupied by phagocytic macrophages and lymphocytes and enclosed by a dense astrocytic scar. Specific human immune cell types, including three distinct subsets of human monocytes, were readily detected in the blood, spleen and liver. Future studies that aim to understand the functional consequences of manipulating the neuro-immune axis after SCI should consider using the humanized mouse model. Humanized mice represent a powerful tool for improving the translational value of pre-clinical SCI data.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsAntigens, CDCalcium-Binding ProteinsDisease Models, AnimalDNA-Binding ProteinsFlow CytometryHindlimbHumansInterleukin-2LamininLeukocyte Common AntigensMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDMice, TransgenicAIF1 protein, humanAntigens, CDCalcium-Binding ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsIL2 protein, humanInterleukin-2LamininLeukocyte Common AntigensMicrofilament ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsFunctional recoveryHematopoiesisHumanized miceInflammationLymphocytesMacrophagesNeuroimmunologySpinal cord injuryStem cells

Identifiers

PMID26193167
PMCPMC4586484
OpenAlexW917920678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.