Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26193059›Full record

Trial reportObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2015

Energy intake, nonexercise physical activity, and weight loss in responders and nonresponders: The Midwest Exercise Trial 2.

Stephen D Herrmann, Erik A Willis, Jeffery J Honas, Jaehoon Lee, Richard A Washburn, Joseph E Donnelly

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The role of physical activity in the regulation of body weight: The overlooked contribution of light physical activity and sedentary behaviors.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Examining the Role of Exercise Timing in Weight Management: A Review.International journal of sports medicine · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021
    Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen D HerrmannCenter for Health Outcomes & Prevention Research, Sanford Research, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.
Erik A WillisDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Jeffery J HonasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Jaehoon LeeInstitute for Measurement, Methodology, Analysis, and Policy, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Richard A WashburnDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Joseph E DonnellyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.

Funding

LONG-TERM EXERCISE WEIGHT LOSS AND ENERGY BALANCER01DK049181 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA KEARNEY · PI DONNELLY, JOSEPH E. · 1996 to 2009
$3.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK049181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare energy intake, total daily energy expenditure (TDEE), nonexercise energy expenditure (NEEx), resting metabolic rate (RMR), nonexercise physical activity (NEPA), and sedentary time between participants with weight loss <5% (nonresponders) vs. ≥5% (responders) in response to exercise.

methodsAdults (18-30 years) with overweight/obesity (BMI 25-40 kg/m(2) ) were randomized to exercise: 5 days/week, 400 or 600 kcal/session, 10 months.

resultsOf the participants, 40 responded and 34 did not respond to the exercise protocol. Nonresponder energy intake was higher vs. responders, significant only in men (P=0.034). TDEE increased only in responders (P=0.001). NEEx increased in responders and decreased in nonresponders, significant only in men (P=0.045). There were no within- or between-group differences for change in RMR. NEPA increased in responders and decreased in nonresponders (group-by-time interactions: total sample, P=0.049; men, P=0.016). Sedentary time decreased in both groups, significant only in men.

conclusionsMen who did not lose weight in response to exercise (<5%) had higher energy intake and lower NEEx when compared with men losing ≥5%. No significant differences in any parameters assessed were observed between women who lost <5% vs. those losing ≥5%. Factors associated with the weight loss response to exercise in women warrant additional investigation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultEnergy IntakeExerciseFemaleHumansKansasMaleObesityTreatment OutcomeWeight LossYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26193059
PMCPMC4578726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.