Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26192752›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Are Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Playing a Role in the Parasite Control in Active American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis Lesions?

Fernanda Nazaré Morgado, Michelle T C Nascimento, Elvira M Saraiva, Carla de Oliveira-Ribeiro, Maria de Fátima Madeira, Marcela da Costa-Santos, Erica C F Vasconcellos, Maria Ines F Pimentel, Marcelo Rosandiski Lyra, Armando de Oliveira Schubach and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. NETosis in Parasitic Infections: A Puzzle That Remains Unsolved.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fernanda Nazaré MorgadoLaboratório de Imunoparasitologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz IOC/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Michelle T C NascimentoDepartamento de Imunologia, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Elvira M SaraivaDepartamento de Imunologia, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carla de Oliveira-RibeiroLaboratório de Imunoparasitologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz IOC/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Laboratório de Vigilância em Leishmanioses-VigiLeish, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas INI/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria de Fátima MadeiraLaboratório de Vigilância em Leishmanioses-VigiLeish, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas INI/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marcela da Costa-SantosLaboratório de Imunoparasitologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz IOC/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Erica C F VasconcellosLaboratório de Vigilância em Leishmanioses-VigiLeish, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas INI/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria Ines F PimentelLaboratório de Vigilância em Leishmanioses-VigiLeish, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas INI/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marcelo Rosandiski LyraLaboratório de Vigilância em Leishmanioses-VigiLeish, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas INI/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Armando de Oliveira SchubachLaboratório de Vigilância em Leishmanioses-VigiLeish, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas INI/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fátima Conceição-SilvaLaboratório de Imunoparasitologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz IOC/FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRInstituto Evandro Chagas · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have been described as a network of extracellular fibers composed by DNA, histones and various proteins/enzymes. Studies have demonstrated that NETs could be responsible for the trapping and elimination of a variety of infectious agents. In order to verify the presence of NETs in American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) and their relationship with the presence of amastigotes we evaluated active cutaneous lesions of 35 patients before treatment by the detection of parasites, neutrophils (neutrophil elastase) and histones through immunohistochemistry and confocal immunofluorescence. Intact neutrophils could be detected in all ATL lesions. NETs were present in 27 patients (median 1.1; range from 0.1 to 23.5/mm2) with lesion duration ranging from one to seven months. NETs were in close proximity with neutrophils (r = 0.586; p = 0.0001) and amastigotes (r = 0.710; p = 0.0001). Two patterns of NET formation were detected: small homogeneously distributed networks observed in all lesions; and large structures that could be visualized at a lower magnification in lesions presenting at least 20% of neutrophils. Lesions presenting the larger NET formation showed high parasite detection. A correlation between NET size and the number of intact amastigotes was observed (p=0.02). As we detected an association between NET and amastigotes, our results suggest that neutrophil migration and NET formation could be stimulated and maintained by stimuli derived from the parasite burden/parasite antigen in the extracellular environment. The observation of areas containing only antigens not intermingled with NETs (elastase and histone) suggests that the involvement of these structures in the control of parasite burden is a dynamic process in which the formation of NETs is exhausted with the destruction of the parasites. Since NETs were also associated with granulomas, this trapping would favor the activity of macrophages in order to control the parasite burden.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDNA, ProtozoanExtracellular TrapsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLeishmaniasis, CutaneousMacrophagesMaleMicroscopy, FluorescenceMiddle AgedNeutrophilsPancreatic ElastaseYoung AdultDNA, ProtozoanPancreatic Elastase

Identifiers

PMID26192752
PMCPMC4508047
OpenAlexW1001666395

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.