Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26192465›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2015

A fresh perspective from immunologists and vaccine researchers: active vaccination strategies to prevent and reverse Alzheimer's disease.

Michael G Agadjanyan, Nikolai Petrovsky, Anahit Ghochikyan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. The Clinical Trials Landscape for Alzheimer's Disease.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A walk through tau therapeutic strategies.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. UB-311, a novel UBIThAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael G AgadjanyanDepartment of Molecular Immunology, Institute for Molecular Medicine, Huntington Beach, CA, USA; The Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. Electronic address: magadjanyan@immed.org.
Nikolai PetrovskyVaxine Pty Ltd, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia; Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.
Anahit GhochikyanDepartment of Molecular Immunology, Institute for Molecular Medicine, Huntington Beach, CA, USA.
Institute for Molecular Medicine · USFlinders University · AU

Funding

Combining AD Epitope Vaccine with Innate ImmunityR01NS050895 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI AGADJANYAN, MICHAEL G, CRIBBS, DAVID HASTINGS · 2004 to 2018
$7.4M
Multiple Approaches to Abeta Vaccination in Animal ModelsR01AG020241 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI AGADJANYAN, MICHAEL G, CRIBBS, DAVID HASTINGS · 2001 to 2016
$5.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020241NIA NIH HHS R01-AG020241NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050895NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS050895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional vaccination against infectious diseases relies on generation of cellular and humoral immune responses that act to protect the host from overt disease even though they do not induce sterilizing immunity. More recently, attempts have been made with mixed success to generate therapeutic vaccines against a wide range of noninfectious diseases including neurodegenerative disorders. After the exciting first report of successful vaccine prevention of progression of an Alzheimer's disease (AD) animal model in 1999, various epitope-based vaccines targeting amyloid beta (Aβ) have proceeded to human clinical trials, with varied results. More recently, AD vaccines based on tau protein have advanced into clinical testing too. This review seeks to put perspective to the mixed results obtained so far in clinical trials of AD vaccines and discusses the many pitfalls and misconceptions encountered on the path to a successful AD vaccine, including better standardization of immunologic efficacy measures of antibodies, immunogenicity of platform/carrier and adjuvants.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAlzheimer VaccinesAnimalsAntibody FormationClinical Trials as TopicHumanstau ProteinsVaccinationAlzheimer Vaccinestau ProteinsAlzheimer's diseaseAntibody titersB cell epitopeClinical trialsTau proteinTh cell epitopeVaccineβ-amyloid

Identifiers

PMID26192465
PMCPMC4630107
OpenAlexW2102389579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.