Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26192136›Full record

ReviewCell adhesion & migration2015

Physical view on migration modes.

Claudia Tanja Mierke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell adhesion & migration, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Actin cytoskeleton in mesenchymal-to-amoeboid transition of cancer cells.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Apoptosis: Activation and Inhibition in Health and Disease.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Therapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Claudia Tanja Mierkea Faculty of Physics and Earth Science; Institute of Experimental Physics I; Biological Physics Division; University of Leipzig ; Leipzig , Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular motility is essential for many processes such as embryonic development, wound healing processes, tissue assembly and regeneration, immune cell trafficing and diseases such as cancer. The migration efficiency and the migratory potential depend on the type of migration mode. The previously established migration modes such as epithelial (non-migratory) and mesenchymal (migratory) as well as amoeboid (squeezing motility) relay mainly on phenomenological criteria such as cell morphology and molecular biological criteria such as gene expression. However, the physical view on the migration modes is still not well understood. As the process of malignant cancer progression such as metastasis depends on the migration of single cancer cells and their migration mode, this review focuses on the different migration strategies and discusses which mechanical prerequisites are necessary to perform a special migration mode through a 3-dimensional microenvironment. In particular, this review discusses how cells can distinguish and finally switch between the migration modes and what impact do the physical properties of cells and their microenvironment have on the transition between the novel migration modes such as blebbing and protrusive motility.

Indexed as

Cell MovementAnimalsCell MembraneCell ShapeCell Surface ExtensionsCellular MicroenvironmentEpitheliumHumansMesodermNeoplasm Metastasisacto-myosin cytoskeletonblebbingcell invasioncellular stiffnesscontractile forcescytoskeletal remodelingfocal adhesionsintegrinsintermediate filamentsmatrix-metalloproteasestransendothelial migration

Identifiers

PMID26192136
PMCPMC4955371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.